Earlier quoted context omitted.
> AGI would mean something which doesn't need direction or guidance to do anything. Like us humans, ... Name me a human that also doesn't need direction or guidance to do a task, at least one they haven't done before
> Name me a human that also doesn't need direction or guidance to do a task, at least one they haven't done before Literally everything that's been invented.
Evolving OpenAI's Structure
441–450 of 746 posts
Re: Evolving OpenAI's Structure
#442Earlier quoted context omitted.
Google is one of the most valuable brands ever. Everyone knows it. It is even used for "searching the web" openai is not that strong of a brand
I think for the general public ChatGPT is a much stronger brand than OpenAI itself.
Re: Evolving OpenAI's Structure
#443Is there a sport where the actual sport is moving goalposts?
Re: Evolving OpenAI's Structure
#444SamA is in a hurry because he's set to lose the race. We're at peak valuation and he needs to convert something now . If the entrenched giants (Google, Microsoft and Apple) catch up - and Google 100% has, if not surpassed - they have a thousand levers to pull and OpenAI is done for. Microsoft has realized this, hence why they're breaking up with them - Google and Anthropic have shown they don't need OpenAI. Galaxy ph…
ask 10 people on the street about chatgpt or gemini and see which one they know
Re: Evolving OpenAI's Structure
#445Earlier quoted context omitted.
thats just brand recognition. The fact that people know Coca Cola doesnt mean they drink it.
It doesn’t? That name recognition made Coca Cola into a very successful global corporation.
Knowing and using are not the same thing.
Re: Evolving OpenAI's Structure
#446Earlier quoted context omitted.
Democratic AI but we don’t want it regulated by any democratic process
I wonder if democracy is some kind of corporate speech homonym of some totally different concept I'm familiar with. Perhaps it's even an interesting linguistic case where a word is a homonym of its antonym? Edit: also apparently known as contronym.
Re: Evolving OpenAI's Structure
#447Earlier quoted context omitted.
AGI can't really be a winner take all market. The 'reward' for general intelligence is infinite as a monopoly and it accelerates productivity. Not only is there infinite incentive to compete, but theres decreasing costs to. The only world in which AGI is winner take all is a world in which it is extremely controlled to the point at which the public cant query it.
Nothing OpenAI is doing, or ever has done, has been close to AGI.
Re: Evolving OpenAI's Structure
#448Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are people who can’t drive cars. Are they not general intelligence? I think we need to separate the thinking part of intelligence from tool usage. Not everyone can use every tool at a high level of expertise.
Generally speaking, anyone can learn to use any tool. This isn't true of generative AI systems which can only learn through specialized training with meticulously curated data sets.
but so do I!
Re: Evolving OpenAI's Structure
#449I think this is one of the most interesting lines as it basically directly implies that leadership thinks this won't be a winner take all market: > Instead of our current complex capped-profit structure—which made sense when it looked like there might be one dominant AGI effort but doesn’t in a world of many great AGI companies—we are moving to a normal capital structure where everyone has stock. This is not a sale,…
That is a very obvious thing for them to say though regardless of what they truly believe, because (a) it legitimizes removing the cap , making fundraising easier and (b) averts antitrust suspicions.
Re: Evolving OpenAI's Structure
#450Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nothing OpenAI is doing, or ever has done, has been close to AGI.
Please, keep telling people that. For my sake. Keep the world asleep as I take advantage of this technology which is literally General Artificial Intelligence that I can apply towards increasing my power.