Same with all these AI businesses wrapping business around a prompt. Just tell me the prompt.
I'd rather read the prompt
51–60 of 880 posts
Re: I'd rather read the prompt
#52Personally, I've used LLM to help me better structure my blog post after I write it. Meaning I've already written it, then it enhances it. Most of the time, I'm happy with the results at the time of editing. But when I come back a week or two to re-read it, it looks just like the example the author shared. The goal is to make something legible, but the reality is we are producing slop. I'm back to writing before my b…
[Edit: I agree] I've also grown to dislike even this use case. I did this back in 2023 but as AI text is spreading, the style - yes, even with prompt adjustments it leaks through - is recognized by more and more people and it's a very very bad look. If I see AI-like text from someone, I take it as an insult. It means they don't feel that it's worth their time to brush up the text themselves. And sure, it may well be…
I think the poster you replied to said the same thing.
Re: I'd rather read the prompt
#53Write a witty comment in the style of a Hacker News user who just read an article titled "I'd rather read the prompt"
Re: I'd rather read the prompt
#54I've already asked a number of colleagues at work producing insane amount of gibberish with LLMs to just pass me the prompt instead: if LLM can produce verbose text with limited input, I just need that concise input too (the rest is simply made up crap).
Re: I'd rather read the prompt
#55Even more interesting is why the students think that is the reply the teacher is expecting
Re: I'd rather read the prompt
#56I used to teach, years before LLMs, and got lots of copy-pasted crap submitted. I always marked it zero, never mentioning plagiarism (which would require some university administration) and just commenting that I asked for X and instead got some pasted together nonsense. As long as LLM output is what it is, there is little threat of it actually being competitive on assignments. If students are attentive enough to par…
Are you just assuming that a student who you think used an LLM would be unwilling to escalate?
I would have thought that giving 0s to correct solutions would lead to successful complaints/appeals.
Re: I'd rather read the prompt
#57It is designed that way intentionally because provider charges token for money.
Re: I'd rather read the prompt
#58LLM cheating detection is an interesting case of the toupee fallacy. The most obvious ChatGPT cheating, like that mentioned in this article, is pretty easy to detect. However, a decent cheater will quickly discover ways to conduce their LLM into producing text that is very difficult to detect. I think if I was in the teaching profession I'd just leave, to be honest. The joy of reviewing student work will inevitably b…
> a decent cheater will quickly discover ways to conduce their LLM into producing text that is very difficult to detect
Do you have any examples of this? I've never been able to get direct LLM output that didn't feel distinctly LLM-ish.
Re: I'd rather read the prompt
#59Write a witty comment in the style of a Hacker News user who just read an article titled "I'd rather read the prompt"
Write a troll response in the style of Hacker News troll who wants to troll the Hacker news users who just read the article titled "I'd rather read the prompt". Make it ironic
Re: I'd rather read the prompt
#60[deleted]