Live data from Hacker News

N8n – Flexible AI workflow automation for technical teams

n8n.io

51–60 of 101 posts

Re: N8n – Flexible AI workflow automation for technical teams

#51

I've always found that these no-code workflow builders fail to hit the right abstraction - especially when new paradigms are added.

This is not no-code.

It allows you to write custom nodes with arbitrary code, but also connect them to existing integrations. Also, for each connection you can transform/select the data using JavaScript.

Re: N8n – Flexible AI workflow automation for technical teams

#52
post #36

n8n has been good but not great in our organization (and we pronounce it "Nathan", to answer someone else's question). It's effectively a self-hosted version of Zapier and has quite a few built-in integrations. It's a bit more annoying to use than Zapier (but the price is right), and the AI features are currently about like the AI features of every other product: basically sufficient to tell investors "we do AI!" but…

How would you compare it with activepieces.com? It’s also self hostable but OSS license.

Open core MIT expat https://github.com/activepieces/activepieces/blob/0.51.0/LIC...

And their Launch HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34723989

Re: N8n – Flexible AI workflow automation for technical teams

#53

Did something new happen here? Almost feels like an ad for n8n. This product has been there for a while.

I just found about it a few weeks ago, and it worked surprisingly well for me, and I'm happy I stumbled upon it.

I submitted it, seeing that it was not discussed recently, maybe it's useful to anyone else.

I using the self-hosted version.

Re: N8n – Flexible AI workflow automation for technical teams

#54
post #25

Looks like a product you'd end up with if a few years back you thought to yourself "how do I make a business combining AI and pipelines?". I don't hate AI as such, I just don't love how it has to be shoved into every product or tech imaginable these days.

Yeah, the title is misleading. I use it to automate non-AI stuff too, and probably n8n was there before all the AI hype too.

Re: N8n – Flexible AI workflow automation for technical teams

#55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can highly recommend n8n. I prefer it over Make.com, Pipedream, Zapier, etc. for automations and AI agent tasks. Basically, anything you want to automate but don't want to spin up a custom code server each time. The main reasons I switched to n8n are it's open source, meaning I can run it locally without limits, and it supports code nodes in javascript and python. Make.com used to drive me bonkers when it took 10+…

It’s not open source though.

Wow, that's just about the dumbest licensing clause I've ever seen in my life:

> Content of branches other than the main branch (i.e. "master") are not licensed

How the fuck do pull requests work in that setup? Or presumably tags aren't licensed?! Holy shit

Anyway, seems to be some rando made up license https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/blob/master/LICENSE.md#sustain...

Re: N8n – Flexible AI workflow automation for technical teams

#56

I have a friend that uses them, but I took a separate route and just decided to learn programming basics, at least enough to be able to vibe code. I'm thinking why not just use APIs?

I think you did the right choice, but not everyone wants to take the longer route, so this is why n8n exists!

I think using this without programming knowledge is hard, you'll hit a lot of errors and data transformation issues that are hard to solve without knowing programming 101 like arrays, objects, data access, etc.

But, if you do know how to code, this makes it easy to quickly integrate stuff without having to write all the connection boilerplate code.

Re: N8n – Flexible AI workflow automation for technical teams

#57
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s early days but check out Tracecat. I’ve been playing with it a bit and love it!

Be aware of its AGPL license: https://github.com/TracecatHQ/tracecat/blob/0.34.1/LICENSE

n8n has even more restrictive license.

Re: N8n – Flexible AI workflow automation for technical teams

#58
post #38
post #13

Can someone talk about their experience using n8n? I’ve seen it in passing a lot lately, but I wonder what some good successful use cases are

I recently started using it, and as an experienced developer, I love it. It's really easy to automate tasks and schedule things. For example, I connected it to my UXWizz MySQL database, asked the AI in UXWizz to give me a query with the funnel conversions for today (visits/pricing/checkout/sales) compared to last week, copied that into n8n and made it send me an emoji-formatted daily Telegram message. I am now using…

Can I ask you why so many things with N8N is connected over Telegram it seems versus for example slack? Not a user of Telegram so I honestly am curious about this choice

Re: N8n – Flexible AI workflow automation for technical teams

#59
post #58
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I recently started using it, and as an experienced developer, I love it. It's really easy to automate tasks and schedule things. For example, I connected it to my UXWizz MySQL database, asked the AI in UXWizz to give me a query with the funnel conversions for today (visits/pricing/checkout/sales) compared to last week, copied that into n8n and made it send me an emoji-formatted daily Telegram message. I am now using…

Can I ask you why so many things with N8N is connected over Telegram it seems versus for example slack? Not a user of Telegram so I honestly am curious about this choice

I think many users choose Telegram, as it's really simple. Slack is usually slightly more work to setup, e.g. creating the slack bot for it. I'm using Slack ware more than telegram, but I guess both work.

Re: N8n – Flexible AI workflow automation for technical teams

#60

n8n has been good but not great in our organization (and we pronounce it "Nathan", to answer someone else's question). It's effectively a self-hosted version of Zapier and has quite a few built-in integrations. It's a bit more annoying to use than Zapier (but the price is right), and the AI features are currently about like the AI features of every other product: basically sufficient to tell investors "we do AI!" but…

How would you compare it with Node Red? I've just poked at them, but my impression was that Node Red much more capable. IIRC one of my issues with n8n was the lack of streaming ability, which kills it for large datasets.

My approach to using Node-RED for AI has been to build re-usable sub flows with high-level functionality (parser, chunker, etc.).

You can go a _long_ way with the split/join nodes and a little ingenuity to work around any issues with streaming.

Post reply on HN