N8n – Flexible AI workflow automation for technical teams
1–10 of 101 posts
Re: N8n – Flexible AI workflow automation for technical teams
#2Re: N8n – Flexible AI workflow automation for technical teams
#3Aside from that, I've been thinking about no/low-code solutions for educational purposes. I'm an incoming professor of a university and most my students have little background in CS or related fields. The university insists on using tools like Alteryx but I want to see if free open-source solutions exist (because that way, students can use the tools after graduation).
So far I've seen Dify, Flowise, Langflow, n8n, Make. The last two seem to be more general while the other ones are tailored to LLMs (which is the focus of my courses—applications of LLMs in management).
Re: N8n – Flexible AI workflow automation for technical teams
#4Can't say I'm a fan of the €55M financing round they took though. I mean, congratulations to them, but the growth they'll need to satisfy those investors is so very likely to lead to chasing numbers and enshittifying the product down the line.
Re: N8n – Flexible AI workflow automation for technical teams
#5I'm thinking why not just use APIs?
Re: N8n – Flexible AI workflow automation for technical teams
#6Simple to self host and use, can recommend. Can't say I'm a fan of the €55M financing round they took though. I mean, congratulations to them, but the growth they'll need to satisfy those investors is so very likely to lead to chasing numbers and enshittifying the product down the line.
Re: N8n – Flexible AI workflow automation for technical teams
#7Re: N8n – Flexible AI workflow automation for technical teams
#8Re: N8n – Flexible AI workflow automation for technical teams
#9If you’re looking for an Open Source alternative, give Windmill a try.
I hadn't seen this term before but it looks interesting:
Re: N8n – Flexible AI workflow automation for technical teams
#10If you’re looking for an Open Source alternative, give Windmill a try.
And whereas Windmill seems to be agpl + apache.
So that is what you are mentioning, right?