Live data from Hacker News

Don't watermark your legal PDFs with purple dragons in suits

arstechnica.com

111–120 of 297 posts

Re: Don't watermark your legal PDFs with purple dragons in suits

#112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Surely you are aware that a lot of the people on this site interview in their jeans

If the CEO invites you to dinner at a high end restaurant hopefully you change into something a bit nicer.

Blazer and jeans, of course.

Re: Don't watermark your legal PDFs with purple dragons in suits

#113
post #91
post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Au contraire, FOSS allows you to fork and make modifications.

This just confirms OP’s point that "you don't have any say in what the developer does", since the only way to get your modifications in if the developer disagrees is to maintain your own version of the code.

This is also true of paid software, except you have to start from scratch.

Re: Don't watermark your legal PDFs with purple dragons in suits

#114
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For example, I like to put Batman as a dummy user I can't remember the details, but I've heard a story multiple times about a fake-sounding name being used in testing -- I think US military payroll? -- and causing problems when a real person had that name. Can anyone here remember this? In any case, "batman" is just about plausible enough that it could be real. I tend to use names like "Mr. Testy Testalicious" which…

Caterina Fake, co-founder of Flickr, famously had issues with IT systems: Tim: There’re so many places we could start, but in the process of doing homework for this, I found mentioned, and I wanted to do a fact check on this, of you having plane tickets automatically cancelled, and other issues related to your last name. Is that accurate? Did those things actually happen? Caterina Fake: This has happened to me many t…

People named Null are also having struggles in the modern world:

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20160325-the-names-that-b...

Re: Don't watermark your legal PDFs with purple dragons in suits

#115
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For example, I like to put Batman as a dummy user I can't remember the details, but I've heard a story multiple times about a fake-sounding name being used in testing -- I think US military payroll? -- and causing problems when a real person had that name. Can anyone here remember this? In any case, "batman" is just about plausible enough that it could be real. I tend to use names like "Mr. Testy Testalicious" which…

Caterina Fake, co-founder of Flickr, famously had issues with IT systems: Tim: There’re so many places we could start, but in the process of doing homework for this, I found mentioned, and I wanted to do a fact check on this, of you having plane tickets automatically cancelled, and other issues related to your last name. Is that accurate? Did those things actually happen? Caterina Fake: This has happened to me many t…

This seems like a good spot for the link to @patio11's "Falsehoods Programmers Believe About Names"

  So, as a public service, I’m going to list assumptions your systems probably 
  make about names.  All of these assumptions are wrong.  Try to make less of 
  them next time you write a system which touches names.
https://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programmers-...

Re: Don't watermark your legal PDFs with purple dragons in suits

#116

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nah this is not the place to let folks get cutesy. If anything the standards should be strict and uniform.

Yes, the dragon is terrible and it's very inappropriate, but someone can't behave sensibly may still be someone whose case the courts must hear.

They’re more than willing to hear the case. It’s the lawyer, not the complainant, who the court is chastising.

If anything, it scans like the court is concerned, like you are, that this vulnerable person’s case isn’t being presented with the seriousness it deserves.

Re: Don't watermark your legal PDFs with purple dragons in suits

#117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nah this is not the place to let folks get cutesy. If anything the standards should be strict and uniform.

Yes, the dragon is terrible and it's very inappropriate, but someone can't behave sensibly may still be someone whose case the courts must hear.

[deleted]

Re: Don't watermark your legal PDFs with purple dragons in suits

#119

- "The whole story would be far more humorous were it not from a case in which Perrone represented a woman who claims that she nearly died after being incarcerated and not given proper medical care. Perrone must now refile his complaint in that case—without the cartoon dragon." That should be more offensive than cartoons. In a just world. It's not as if the victim had the luxury of many choices of law firms, or any c…

To a normal person, sure. But the legal system ruins lives and deals in ruined lives every day. They don't blink twice at that stuff. A cartoon dragon on the other hand...

The formality of the process helps them keep their conscious clear. Attacking the formality of the process therefore threatens them.
Post reply on HN