Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm apathetic, but please let's not start the trend of self-aware "downvote me" or "why the downvotes?" comments on this website. I'm of the opinion that it's needless, manipulative clutter.
I agree that the former is clutter, but the latter is good, as long as the commenter is clearly trying to learn from/correct whatever mistake they had made. e.g. "This is being downvoted and I don't understand why. Could someone please explain the problem?" or "Why the downvotes? Is it because ...?"
The first Django site to run on Python 3
31–40 of 59 posts
Re: The first Django site to run on Python 3
#32Not only a major boost for Python 3 adoption but also a reference for how Unicode handling [1] can be successfully ported from Python 2.x libraries. They seem to be on schedule as well, which is brilliant [2]. [1]: http://wiki.python.org/moin/PortingDjangoTo3k [2]: https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2012/mar/13/py3k/
yeah we already had in Pyramid 1.3 for ages ;-) I can never be surprised enough how people are excited about django features that others take for granted.
Does anyone get excited at the mere thought that some framework, somewhere has a particular feature? If you aren't using Pyramid then what good does it do you?
Re: The first Django site to run on Python 3
#33Well, the authors of frameworks and libraries still on Python 2 and without having concrete upgrade plans will have to either do something soon or others will take their space. Python 3 is here, now.
Re: The first Django site to run on Python 3
#34Well, the authors of frameworks and libraries still on Python 2 and without having concrete upgrade plans will have to either do something soon or others will take their space. Python 3 is here, now.
Until Numpy and Scipy are on Python 3, I'm going to reserve judgement. Python 3 might be here, now, for some things, but there are enough essential libraries out there that aren't, that it's not for most.
Also, Python 3 will be shipped with the next ubuntu version https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QuantalQuetzal/TechnicalOverview/Alp...
Re: The first Django site to run on Python 3
#35Well, the authors of frameworks and libraries still on Python 2 and without having concrete upgrade plans will have to either do something soon or others will take their space. Python 3 is here, now.
Until Numpy and Scipy are on Python 3, I'm going to reserve judgement. Python 3 might be here, now, for some things, but there are enough essential libraries out there that aren't, that it's not for most.
Re: The first Django site to run on Python 3
#36Re: The first Django site to run on Python 3
#37Well, the authors of frameworks and libraries still on Python 2 and without having concrete upgrade plans will have to either do something soon or others will take their space. Python 3 is here, now.
Until Numpy and Scipy are on Python 3, I'm going to reserve judgement. Python 3 might be here, now, for some things, but there are enough essential libraries out there that aren't, that it's not for most.
Very early on I had plenty of headaches where some library I needed was Python 2.X only, but that's becoming increasingly rare.
Edit: s/eminently/imminently/
Re: The first Django site to run on Python 3
#38The last time I tried doing that I ended up in some weird quagmire with the LD_LIBRARY_PATH being messed up. There must be a standard way to install it?
Re: The first Django site to run on Python 3
#39Re: The first Django site to run on Python 3
#40Relatedly, what's the correct way to install Python 3 on a Linux server (debian based) so I can try this? while keeping Python 2.x. The last time I tried doing that I ended up in some weird quagmire with the LD_LIBRARY_PATH being messed up. There must be a standard way to install it?
apt-get install python3
It's always worked for me.