Don't watermark your legal PDFs with purple dragons in suits
arstechnica.com
Don't watermark your legal PDFs with purple dragons in suits
1–10 of 297 posts
Re: Don't watermark your legal PDFs with purple dragons in suits
#2Re: Don't watermark your legal PDFs with purple dragons in suits
#3[flagged]
Re: Don't watermark your legal PDFs with purple dragons in suits
#4We do it so it's obvious it's test data, and also we're lazy to think of more "real" data.
Just say some users expect real(ish) data for testing. I had a client who was totally not happy when he saw Batman and Superman in the test data.
Re: Don't watermark your legal PDFs with purple dragons in suits
#5[flagged]
Re: Don't watermark your legal PDFs with purple dragons in suits
#6Re: Don't watermark your legal PDFs with purple dragons in suits
#7What do you call someone who likes dragons? Scalies?
Re: Don't watermark your legal PDFs with purple dragons in suits
#8Also, sometimes we (developers) like to use wacky data for testing purposes. For example, I like to put Batman as a dummy user, and my QA likes to upload cat pictures when testing uploads/images. We do it so it's obvious it's test data, and also we're lazy to think of more "real" data. Just say some users expect real(ish) data for testing. I had a client who was totally not happy when he saw Batman and Superman in th…
Re: Don't watermark your legal PDFs with purple dragons in suits
#9I get why furries are called that — they’re into human-animal caricatures with fur. What do you call someone who likes dragons? Scalies?
Re: Don't watermark your legal PDFs with purple dragons in suits
#10[flagged]