Live data from Hacker News

Thinking This iPad Mini Thing Even Througher

daringfireball.net

71–80 of 92 posts

Re: Thinking This iPad Mini Thing Even Througher

#71
post #2

I'm glad Gruber seems to be writing more of these long form pieces. Short and snarky is not as much of a strength for him as he thinks it is. On the content: Right on. I will definitely be surprised if the words "thinner" and "lighter" do not feature prominently in Apple's keynote, both vs. the Retina iPad and the Google/Amazon competition.

Short and snarky is not as much of a strength for him as he thinks it is. The snark is why I had to stop reading Gruber. He's a great blogger, but his attitude made me have to walk away every few articles and just take a breather. It's not an endearing trait.

I've had the same reaction and gone for long periods without reading Gruber for this reason. I do agree that he has toned down - far fewer jackass awards (which always seemed unnecessarily petty).

I wonder if some of his gentler tone has to do with Apple's success. It's easier to be gracious when you feel you are on a winning/popular side, and there are certainly fewer reasons for Apple users/fans to feel persecuted by misinformed pundits nowadays.

What's funny is how Apple whose very core has always been counter cultural has now become mainstream, and Android has become the new counter cultural reaction (even though Android is just as much the product of large corporations and not exactly the product of a new youthful startup). Samsung's marketing team has certainly been effective at reminding us that the hipster crowd is aging - and becoming less cool. Apple itself needs to decide whether it wants to become a mature company or somehow hold onto that more youthful "stay hungry, stay foolish" mantra.

Re: Thinking This iPad Mini Thing Even Througher

#72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

EInk Kindles can't really do email, or twitter, or skype or angry birds. Right now I tote around three devices (four when I haul my laptop.) A smaller iPad means I get rid of the Kindle and the iPod touch.

Really? I find reading on any device for a decent length of time that isn't e-ink a real pain.

EInk is definitely better, but I read the entire "Game of Thrones" series last summer on my iPod touch using the Kindle.app.

Re: Thinking This iPad Mini Thing Even Througher

#73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Really? I find reading on any device for a decent length of time that isn't e-ink a real pain.

EInk is definitely better, but I read the entire "Game of Thrones" series last summer on my iPod touch using the Kindle.app.

I have used the GoodReader app on iTouch/iPhone and read about 10 MB of txt files so far. (The 2001 triology, all Stainless Steelrat, the Red/Green/Blue Mars triology, a lot of Heinlein, the Ringworld triology)

I find the iDevice very easi to read on. Perhaps e-ink is even better.

Re: Thinking This iPad Mini Thing Even Througher

#74
post #34
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Limiting to low PPI for app compatibility seems like a hack. What, and give developers another resolution to develop for? No. The iPad Mini will use the iPhone 3GS LCD pixel density. Then in a year, the iPad Mini will adopt the iPhone 4 pixel density. This means that every "retina" iPad app that currently exists will display natively on the device. So basically: wait a year and then you'll have that crazy-good iPhon…

So you're saying that the next-year Retina iPad Mini will effectively fit 2048x1536 pixels into a 7.85" screen? That would indeed be amazing, but I doubt it will happen next year.

It's only a matter of cutting the iPhone 4 LCD sheets larger. (And having a chipset that can power it more efficiently than the iPad 3.) Since it'll come out 1.5 to 2 years later, that's not far fetched.

Re: Thinking This iPad Mini Thing Even Througher

#75

The thinness angle doesn't sound right to me and would be a bad decision to trade it for real features. Thinness is important, don't get me wrong, but nearly all iOS device users use cases. The thickness of a case can often double overall size and weight in your hand. This that isn't going to change, probably ever.

Apple has used 'thinner' and 'lighter' as a differentiator across all of its production lines for years. This won't change because their customers use cases.

Re: Thinking This iPad Mini Thing Even Througher

#76

The thinness angle doesn't sound right to me and would be a bad decision to trade it for real features. Thinness is important, don't get me wrong, but nearly all iOS device users use cases. The thickness of a case can often double overall size and weight in your hand. This that isn't going to change, probably ever.

I won't mind the thinness as long as it doesn't result in a bad battery life. But one result I worry about is whether the "iPad Mini" will have a cellular transceiver. My iPad 3 has Verizon LTE, and I though I was worried that it would be superfluous, I find it essential. The value (to me) of the iPad Mini would drop a lot if it lacks GPS/cellular.

Re: Thinking This iPad Mini Thing Even Througher

#78
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Um... So a quarter notable mostly for Apples entry into a tablet form factor market already pioneered by other competitors is somehow a testament to the platform's... dominance? (I really want to respond to the idea of yearning for another IBM/Microsoft-scale monopoly too, but I'll limit myself to simple snark for now.)

Apple's entry into the phone market already pioneered by other competitors is a testament to the platform's dominance. Also, no one would be making tablets of any size if it weren't for the success of the iPad (introduced January 2010.) If you recall, 2009 was all about the netbooks. Remember them? Nobody else does either. The Nexus 7 (released at the end of June) is the first non-iPad tablet of any size that has eve…

it will outsell the Nexus 7 just because it has an apple on it's back. I know that like everyone in here.

Re: Thinking This iPad Mini Thing Even Througher

#79

ipod touch thin = ridiculously fragile screen, like the macbook air.

I haven't heard of anyone's Air screen breaking, they can't be that fragile. (But I have heard of several people destroying them with coffee or beer).

Well I think that if you pour coffee or beer you would destroy any device, Apple or not.

Re: Thinking This iPad Mini Thing Even Througher

#80
> You might need more thumb-rest room on the sides than you do on the iPhone, but not nearly as much as you do on the full-size iPad.

Why? The iPhone is meant to be held in one hand and manipulated by the other. The iPad has a different use model and hence a slightly different design. How would the use model of the iPad mini be different?

Post reply on HN