Live data from Hacker News

Port of Los Angeles says shipping volume will plummet 35% next week

cnbc.com

331–340 of 672 posts

Re: Port of Los Angeles says shipping volume will plummet 35% next week

#331
There is a good yt channel that deciphers all shipping related news (collisions, cable cuts etc) and makes it more digestible to non-sailors like me here. Definitely recommend.

https://www.youtube.com/@wgowshipping

He pointed out that these stats are week on week so tend to understate how big the drop really is on a more long term scale

[not affiliated, just like the channel]

Re: Port of Los Angeles says shipping volume will plummet 35% next week

#332
post #225

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I disagree: I think it's a decent summary and it's convenient to be able to read it inline with the rest of the discussion without having to go fiddle with some LLM. And I don't think everyone has an LLM just sitting around that can summarize a video from a link. Having wasted 10 minutes of my life watching the video, it's also an accurate summary - "no, shipping has not stopped completely". I would not be happy if t…

Better yet, let’s just add LLM summaries of all articles and links on Hacker News directly. Now I never have to read the linked article.

This seems really obvious to me but:

With a written article I can read a bit at the beginning, skim the contents and still get an idea of what it's about and decide whether I want to read more.

Videos are much more difficult to skim or glance over and the beginning is often some boring intro or music or some dudes asking each other how they've been or something equally wasteful of my time.

Re: Port of Los Angeles says shipping volume will plummet 35% next week

#333
post #311

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I am very much on the fence on this one. I can tell you, without a shadow of a doubt, based on having been in manufacturing across various industries for over thirty years, that the US and Europe have been on a path to loose nearly all manufacturing capacity within ten years, maybe twenty at best. I've now been around long enough to remember people saying this 10-20 years ago. Seems to be plenty of manufacturing st…

> I've now been around long enough to remember people saying this 10-20 years ago. Seems to be plenty of manufacturing still happening. “Plenty” but still less overall than 10-20 years ago, 30, 40, 50 years ago. There’s a quite clear trend to zero here.

Declining absolutely does not mean “clear trend to zero”. There are a great many things which decline for a long time, but have a lower limit.

Re: Port of Los Angeles says shipping volume will plummet 35% next week

#334

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Empty shelves are just one of the symptoms. The real pain will come from companies having to deal with increased taxes (that's what tariffs are) for Chinese components, decreased exports (counter tariffs, anti US sentiments), etc. and then their follow up to that would be using tools like layoffs, price increases, etc. Some of those companies might have to close doors and go bankrupt. If that happens a lot you get th…

I am very much on the fence on this one. I can tell you, without a shadow of a doubt, based on having been in manufacturing across various industries for over thirty years, that the US and Europe have been on a path to loose nearly all manufacturing capacity within ten years, maybe twenty at best. How do we compare the pain (and yes, some destruction) that we have to endure today against the devastation that is clear…

Whatever your hopes and dreams around domestic manufacturing, blanket tariffs capriciously imposed at random are unlikely to get any dream closer to reality, except perhaps the dream of total devastation of all manufacturing.

Let's look at what an actual domestic manufacturer has to say about tariffs[1]?

Oh, looks bad! Turns out, manufacturers import stuff, add value to it, and sell it for more money!

Hopefully we'll get more cast iron plants in Cape Cod. I'm off to the mill!

[1]https://www.vcstar.com/story/news/local/2025/04/09/trump-tar...

Re: Port of Los Angeles says shipping volume will plummet 35% next week

#335
post #143
post #125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I both agree and have been worried that this is overly reductive. As far as I can tell, literally nothing that I buy regularly is directly sourced from China. Or anywhere other than the US & neighboring countries. The vast majority of my groceries are locally sourced. And the vast majority of the rest come from expected regions, for instance San Marzano tomatoes from Italy. I do not regularly buy clothes, children's…

Where do the farmers that grow your food get their fertilizer and fuel from? Or the electronics and hydraulics in their tractors?

Most fertilizer and fuel used in US agriculture is domestically produced. We do import some fertilizer from China. For fertilizers manufactured using natural gas as a feed stock, the US is well positioned to expand production because we have cheaper and more abundant supplies.

Re: Port of Los Angeles says shipping volume will plummet 35% next week

#336

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is there a sense of what products are actually at risk of not being in stock?

A lot of packaging is sourced from China. Things that wouldn't otherwise be a problem will become a problem. Potentially that includes bottles, tins, plastic food packaging, niche carboard boxes. Imports from China are ~40% of all US imports. Even a 10% drop would be difficult, and at current levels it's going to be more than that.

> Imports from China are ~40% of all US imports

You mean 14%?

https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/imports-by-countr...

Re: Port of Los Angeles says shipping volume will plummet 35% next week

#337
post #311

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I've now been around long enough to remember people saying this 10-20 years ago. Seems to be plenty of manufacturing still happening. “Plenty” but still less overall than 10-20 years ago, 30, 40, 50 years ago. There’s a quite clear trend to zero here.

This graph of US manufacturing output in gross dollars suggests otherwise: https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/USA/uni... If you could explain why it’s trending to zero when the dollar value of American manufacturing outputs keeps rising, I’d appreciate it. There are plenty of other charts that contradict you on the St Louis Fed FRED website.

> gross dollars

So, not inflation adjusted. Also doesn't capture the mix of what's being produced, i.e., a shift towards only manufacturing high value items versus being more broadly diversified and manufacturing things along a range of price points. In other words, a complete hollowing out of our manufacturing base.

Your same link shows $1.38T in 1997. Which is $2.77T today. In other words, DOWN in inflation adjusted terms from nearly 30 years ago.

Re: Port of Los Angeles says shipping volume will plummet 35% next week

#338
post #284

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which takes guns. And back at square 1.

I don’t know that it takes guns. If we moved to, say, ranked-choice voting and a multi-party system, the more extreme elements of our country would probably be sidelined.

Did you see the bill introduced the other day?

H.R.3040 - To prohibit the use of ranked choice voting in elections for Federal office.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/3040

Re: Port of Los Angeles says shipping volume will plummet 35% next week

#339
post #311

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I've now been around long enough to remember people saying this 10-20 years ago. Seems to be plenty of manufacturing still happening. “Plenty” but still less overall than 10-20 years ago, 30, 40, 50 years ago. There’s a quite clear trend to zero here.

Declining absolutely does not mean “clear trend to zero”. There are a great many things which decline for a long time, but have a lower limit.

Bit pedantic there, aren't you? I suppose as long as a single factory is still open in the US we're doing just fine, it's not zero, right?

Re: Port of Los Angeles says shipping volume will plummet 35% next week

#340

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Everyone here is worried about it from the American side, but China has motivation to settle this too, so they can continue to sell their enshitified plastic crap. It's not like most other wealthy countries want it, at least not any more than they are already buying.

No, China doesn’t need us at all. They are going to come out of this without a scratch. Everyone is getting this equation wrong.

Where is China going to sell their exports? There are limits to what Europe is able and willing to absorb.
Post reply on HN