Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Deadman.io - a digital dead man's switch

deadman.io

41–50 of 53 posts

Re: Show HN: Deadman.io - a digital dead man's switch

#41

I made the same thing seven years or so ago: http://www.deadmansswitch.net As for the trust issues, you can easily just say "look under the porch in my house", you don't have to reveal all the information there. Or, just encrypt things.

Nice. Do you actually make a reasonable amount of money the on service? The reason I ask is because these dollar/lifetime web services are popping up more, and I find it to be an interesting pricing model

Re: Show HN: Deadman.io - a digital dead man's switch

#42

Yes, I'd gladly share my super-secret - so secret I only want it revealed when I die - stuff with some random website. No bueno. I'm sorry, but this is basically one of those services you can't really run on a hosted environment. I think the ultimate solution is a dead man's switch that is tied to something physical, aka a password in a bank vault that unencrypts a file somewhere. Yes, you have to trust the bank, but…

A use case that might make more sense (though would still require trust) could be things like posting messages to Twitter, Blogs, etc. about your death.

Once it earns some trust, it could offer to sell your startup/website/app to someone that would do a good job of maintaining it (or release it as open source).

Re: Show HN: Deadman.io - a digital dead man's switch

#45
post #41

I made the same thing seven years or so ago: http://www.deadmansswitch.net As for the trust issues, you can easily just say "look under the porch in my house", you don't have to reveal all the information there. Or, just encrypt things.

Nice. Do you actually make a reasonable amount of money the on service? The reason I ask is because these dollar/lifetime web services are popping up more, and I find it to be an interesting pricing model

Not overly, but it's just a side project for me. I should start marketing it more, I chose the lifetime pricing model because downgrading someone's account if they died didn't really make sense for the project...

Re: Show HN: Deadman.io - a digital dead man's switch

#46
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You don't need to tell where , and you can use a one-off generated password that you really didn't memorize.

A) The idea is that the "rubber hose collection" leads to you revealing where it is, and B) if it's a generated password, how will you stop the deadman's switch in the event of getting away?

You ping the service by email/phone/SMS, not by logging in. But you have a point, you'd have to keep pinging it for the rest of your life and it would fire anyway when you die :)

Re: Show HN: Deadman.io - a digital dead man's switch

#47

I made the same thing seven years or so ago: http://www.deadmansswitch.net As for the trust issues, you can easily just say "look under the porch in my house", you don't have to reveal all the information there. Or, just encrypt things.

Previous HN discussion for those interested: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2898994

Re: Show HN: Deadman.io - a digital dead man's switch

#49
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nice. Do you actually make a reasonable amount of money the on service? The reason I ask is because these dollar/lifetime web services are popping up more, and I find it to be an interesting pricing model

Not overly, but it's just a side project for me. I should start marketing it more, I chose the lifetime pricing model because downgrading someone's account if they died didn't really make sense for the project...

For a while now I've wondered if possibly your service could tie into IFTTT. That would be really cool.

Re: Show HN: Deadman.io - a digital dead man's switch

#50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not overly, but it's just a side project for me. I should start marketing it more, I chose the lifetime pricing model because downgrading someone's account if they died didn't really make sense for the project...

For a while now I've wondered if possibly your service could tie into IFTTT. That would be really cool.

I'd definitely be up for it if IFTTT were. Do you mean as a "switch triggered" thing, for Twitter, Facebook, etc?

A problem with that is that people can have custom intervals per-message, so they can have one for "I'm missing for a day", one for a month, etc, so there's no "one" switch. I could make one, though, I guess.

Post reply on HN