Live data from Hacker News

I use zip bombs to protect my server

idiallo.com

1–10 of 467 posts

Re: I use zip bombs to protect my server

#7

Mildly amusing, but it seems like this is thinking that two wrongs make a right, so let us serve malware instead of using a WAF or some other existing solution to the bot problem.

Something like https://xeiaso.net/notes/2025/anubis-works/

I did actually try zip bombs at first. They didn't work due to the architecture of how Amazon's scraper works. It just made the requests get retried.

Re: I use zip bombs to protect my server

#8
post #4

I think it's a good idea, but it must be coupled with robots.txt.

AI scraper bots don't respect robots.txt

I think that's the point, you'd use robots.txt to direct Googlebot/Bingbot/etc away from countermeasures that could potentially mess up your SEO. If other bots ignore the signpost clearly saying not to enter the tarpit, that's their own stupid fault.

Re: I use zip bombs to protect my server

#9

Mildly amusing, but it seems like this is thinking that two wrongs make a right, so let us serve malware instead of using a WAF or some other existing solution to the bot problem.

WAF isn't the right choice for a lot of people: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43793526

Re: I use zip bombs to protect my server

#10
I also had the idea of zip bomb to confuse badly behaved scrapers (and I have mentioned it before to some other people, although I did not implemented it). However, maybe instead of 0x00, you might use a different byte value.

I had other ideas too, but I don't know how well some of them will work (they might depend on what bots they are).

Post reply on HN