Live data from Hacker News

Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney

washingtonpost.com

301–310 of 1001 posts

Re: Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney

#301

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Could one of you point me to antisemitic bias on wikipedia just so I have a concrete example at hand?

https://www.adl.org/resources/report/editing-hate-how-anti-i... Read it for yourself.

The analysis there is not convincing.

It is obvious that Wikipedia admins communicate with each other. The fact that Aljazeera is referenced is also okay.

In fact, this is not the official Israeli narrative, it seems rather trustworthy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli%E2%80%93Palestinian_co...

Re: Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney

#302

Reason and truth are the enemy of authoritarian regimes. They want you to believe that truth is subjective. Truth and reason provide alternative legitimacy to authority. If nothing is true, there is no basis on which to judge those in power. There is a long legacy of authoritarian regimes attacking curious places, universities, historians, museums, books or any institution that grounds itself in reality which provide…

So everything wiki mods believe is truth? What about those who never even got a chance to speak out?

It's always controlled by. Winners write the history. Now Americans decide what's truth and fact

Re: Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney

#303

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's pretty constant on hn. People paint everything from country X, holistically, with some broad and blunt moral brush. It reads like a cartoon. Everything from China is loaded with secret spyware snooping on you for countless unspecified evils - everything out of Russia by anyone is part of some secret global propaganda network. I point it out as absurd and reductive whenever I see it and people dogpile on me like…

>everything out of Russia by anyone is part of some secret global propaganda network. Who has claimed all Russians are part of a large propaganda network. This is about a government news network.

[deleted]

Re: Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney

#304

Reason and truth are the enemy of authoritarian regimes. They want you to believe that truth is subjective. Truth and reason provide alternative legitimacy to authority. If nothing is true, there is no basis on which to judge those in power. There is a long legacy of authoritarian regimes attacking curious places, universities, historians, museums, books or any institution that grounds itself in reality which provide…

According to its cofounder, Wikipedia abandoned truth long ago. https://larrysanger.org/2020/05/wikipedia-is-badly-biased/

It’s pretty clear from this blogpost that Larry Sanger has abandoned a pursuit of truth and neutral point of view and instead does not like how reality fails to conform to his personal biases and preferences about the way the world is.

Re: Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney

#305

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Their silence now is cowardly.

In before this thread is also flagged for being "political".

There's a post that the FBI arrested a judge who helped an illegal immigrant avoid capture during a court proceeding.

900+ upvotes

- it has nothing to do with tech

- it's about a hot button political issue

- it helps the Republican cause.

Not flagged

Re: Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney

#307

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Except that's not coming from the top. Tens of millions of people wanted this. Maybe this is indeed what Russia would do to us. But we're beating them to the punch by doing it to ourselves.

Or they’re aiding it.

Re: Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney

#308
post #302

Reason and truth are the enemy of authoritarian regimes. They want you to believe that truth is subjective. Truth and reason provide alternative legitimacy to authority. If nothing is true, there is no basis on which to judge those in power. There is a long legacy of authoritarian regimes attacking curious places, universities, historians, museums, books or any institution that grounds itself in reality which provide…

So everything wiki mods believe is truth? What about those who never even got a chance to speak out? It's always controlled by. Winners write the history. Now Americans decide what's truth and fact

>Now Americans decide what's truth and fact

what about evidence?

Re: Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney

#309

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Less than 30% of voter age Americans voted for this

100% of voter age Americans made a decision. That includes not registering to vote or not voting. Pretend I want a snack, I can choose between a cookie and an apple. If I dislike both then I also have the option to not get a snack. Neither is selected. This is different from not voting because a candidate still wins.

If the US wanted voting to be more popular, there would be a Federal Holiday to promote it. There is no incentive when there are known costs...at least since the wild inflation of the 80s when it got prohibitive to lose a shift and the slow dissolution of union jobs. This is the result of the tyranny of indifference. Those that benefit continue to promote and benefit, those that do not, are disenfranchised. It's a common theme in history.

Re: Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney

#310

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Martin was also at the coup attempt on Jan 6 and on that day said "Like Mardi Gras in DC today: love, faith and joy. Ignore #FakeNews". https://archive.ph/jekzQ

[flagged]

One time sure, 150+ on the Russia propaganda network ? I’m drawing my own adult conclusions about it: “The friend of my enemy is my enemy”
Post reply on HN