Earlier quoted context omitted.
Talking about our march into fascism is still considered off topic here apparently. Isn’t that exactly the sort of topic a supposed forum of hackers ought to be discussing however?
The concern is that it's too easy to contribute to hot political topics. Moderation wants to prevent this forum from becoming identical to so many others, and the only tool available is to deemphasize posts.
Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney
181–190 of 1001 posts
Re: Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney
#182Re: Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney
#183Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is the same ADL that said that Nazi salutes are fine, but that protesting against genocide isn't? Why do we care what the ADL says about anything? They're fascist sympathisers.
Demanding moral perfection from an organization in order to believe that discrimination exists is a standard that I don't believe is fair to any group.
Re: Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney
#184Re: Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney
#185Earlier quoted context omitted.
We voted for this! This is “democracy” at work
Democracy built lies, decide, and rejection of facts through propaganda. Really need a viable means to fight it, say allowing an elected official's constitutes being able to sue them for no less than $10,000 for incidence of bearing false witness. Help erode the dark money networks. Also having a 4th branch of Governments, the people with State and Federal binding resolution, would help. Only way to overrides those i…
Re: Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney
#186Earlier quoted context omitted.
Basically, almost any time Zionists are mentioned, they're mentioned in a negative light and with genuine disinformation, such as that Zionism is the belief that Arabs needs to be destroyed. That is like saying the Civil Rights movement in the US was about killing white people. They also position things in such a way that implies antisemitic things, such as saying that Zionism is only 200 years old, or discussing the…
Most of the jews I know are through anti-genocide activism and they have a different view of this. I wanted to check because it is important to me that I not engage in antisemitism. Thanks for the info.
Re: Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney
#187[flagged]
also english wikipedia is actually for english speakers.. so it includes countries that aren’t america. there’s a reason they didn’t name it american wikipedia.
Re: Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney
#188Earlier quoted context omitted.
We voted for this! This is “democracy” at work
Less than 30% of voter age Americans voted for this
Re: Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney
#189It's 2 paragraphs... What's the substance of the allegation?
Re: Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney
#190Earlier quoted context omitted.
Demanding moral perfection from an organization in order to believe that discrimination exists is a standard that I don't believe is fair to any group.
I don't demand "moral perfection", but I draw the line at overt fascism. The ADL are fascist sympathisers.
I agree this was a terrible move on the ADL's part, and there have been others, but you're essentially labeling the oldest anti-hate group "fascist" because you disagree with one statement they made.
This dismisses any concerns they raise, or if someone else says the same as them, then they too must be pro-facist.