Live data from Hacker News

Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney

washingtonpost.com

1–10 of 1001 posts

Re: Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney

#4
post #2

Well seems the war on truth has started. There is a 1984 quote about history that escapes me now.

[flagged]

Absolute nonsense. Wikipedia is infinitely better than every source of “facts” out there.

Re: Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney

#6
post #2

Well seems the war on truth has started. There is a 1984 quote about history that escapes me now.

[flagged]

I have never had a single problem with Wikipedia in 20 years, and I don't believe an alternative exists. All text written on Wikipedia is royalty free and so are most of the images. The meaningfulness of that can't be overstated. Wikipedia is the web's greatest website and a wonder of the world.

You can't love the web without loving Wikipedia, so I'm wary of anyone who disrespects it.

Re: Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. attorney

#8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

I have never had a single problem with Wikipedia in 20 years, and I don't believe an alternative exists. All text written on Wikipedia is royalty free and so are most of the images. The meaningfulness of that can't be overstated. Wikipedia is the web's greatest website and a wonder of the world. You can't love the web without loving Wikipedia, so I'm wary of anyone who disrespects it.

In my 20-year experience with Wikipedia, I've seen one factual error relating to the Chicago Cubs, something really minor. But yeah, that's it.
Post reply on HN