Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: JuryNow – Get an anonymous instant verdict from 12 real people

jurynow.app

51–60 of 127 posts

Re: Show HN: JuryNow – Get an anonymous instant verdict from 12 real people

#51
I don't know. All of this smells fishy. Clearly noone has worked 16 years on this. The whole description is odd. Made by a new HN account. The thing barely works. Sometimes you get stuck in the same question loop. Sometimes buttons are huge.

Is it possible that this is some form of clickjacking site?

Re: Show HN: JuryNow – Get an anonymous instant verdict from 12 real people

#52
>> if there are fewer than 13 people playing (and it only just launched last week and that was just on Reddit!) then a popup will appear saying your verdict is simulated by AI. But this is just a TEMPORARY feature with the MVP. As soon as there are regular players, it will be permanently dismantled and we will celebrate the power of collective human intelligence!

Congratulations for a great idea and a fun game, but AFAICT there is no way to stop participants from plugging in an LLM to your site and having the LLM read questions and make decisions. For example, someone might do this to cheat their jury duty and get decisions from others without having to personally invest time and effort.

I don't know what you can do about this. Do you have any ideas?

Re: Show HN: JuryNow – Get an anonymous instant verdict from 12 real people

#53
post #51

I don't know. All of this smells fishy. Clearly noone has worked 16 years on this. The whole description is odd. Made by a new HN account. The thing barely works. Sometimes you get stuck in the same question loop. Sometimes buttons are huge. Is it possible that this is some form of clickjacking site?

Clickjacking hasn’t been a real issue for years. And if it were happening, you’d be able to see it in your web browser’s developer tools.

Re: Show HN: JuryNow – Get an anonymous instant verdict from 12 real people

#54
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also, i see repeated questions? As in i see one question. I vote, the “bar” moves forward, but i see the same question, so i vote again and the same happens. So whoever was picking up skateboarding again in their 30s, but just suffered a hip injury after a fall. I voted that it is time for you to give up like four times. (Which i stand by as an opinion, but perhaps I shouldn’t be so overrepresented in your jury?)

so sorry about that! there was a bug 3 months ago (when i was just testing it with family and friends) when that happened, and one random question would repeat! And it's just come back tongiht!! (just as I post on hacker news!) i think it's fixed now! And thank you again!

It's still happening.

Re: Show HN: JuryNow – Get an anonymous instant verdict from 12 real people

#58

I asked a question that was 4-0, then suddenly 8 votes came in at once that made the score 4-8, i wonder if that was a UI bug or if the 8 votes were the AI kicking in and they all disagreed with the human answer...

I suspect that was the same user clicking on the same answer several times because he was presented the same question over and over again like I've been getting the same question over and over and over (and over) again.

And over. There seems to be something amiss in the question pipeline.

Re: Show HN: JuryNow – Get an anonymous instant verdict from 12 real people

#60
I actually saw this in your previous HN post and tried it out - it's a great improvement to replace the email/password with a captcha, since I anyways filled out a fake email and I'm sure most people would do the same. Super cool concept, congratulations on launching it!
Post reply on HN