Live data from Hacker News

Deafening Silence from the Cybersecurity Industry

forbes.com

21–30 of 280 posts

Re: Deafening Silence from the Cybersecurity Industry

#21
It seems that the idea that someone could be motivated simply by having integrity, valuing honesty and pride in simply "doing their job" correctly is so alien to the current US administration that they see political motives everywhere and in everyone's actions.

The fact that people with such a cynical and amoral worldview wield so much power not only in US but globally and are willing to wield that power in capricious and petty ways is deeply upsetting.

But what is more horrifying for me is that apparently this administration remains representative of a large section of the US population - with seemingly unshakeable approval by between 40% and 50% of the US adult population according to polls.

I love the US, have friends and family there, have a first cousin in the marines, grandfather born there, etc., and have visited many many times and just find it difficult to reconcile my positive experiences with the place and people with the idea that more than 4 out of 10 US adults could approve of the cruel and vindictive actions of this administration. I'm not being over dramatic by stating that it has genuinely shaken my world-view and belief in the innate goodness of humanity.

Re: Deafening Silence from the Cybersecurity Industry

#22
The second line of the EO.

> Yet in recent years, elitist leaders in Government have unlawfully censored speech and weaponized their undeserved influence to silence perceived political opponents and advance their preferred, and often erroneous, narrative about significant matters of public debate

Isn't the executive a branch of government? Physician, heal thyself.

Re: Deafening Silence from the Cybersecurity Industry

#23

Deafening silence about what the executive order actually says or any facts about the case.

1. "It isn't really true, never really happened" 2. "It happened but it's not as serious as you make it out to be."

3. "It may be serious but it is legal and within the president's right."

4. "It may not be legal but when the president does it it is effectively legal because he has to be able to be president without being undermined."

5. "Fascism? What about cancel culture?!"

Re: Deafening Silence from the Cybersecurity Industry

#24
If I have not seen evidence for or against something, then I would not offer an opinion either. Sometimes, people speak confidently when they are ignorant of the context and the facts. That's not the right thing to do.

It's better not to say anything when you don't actually know what you are talking about.

Re: Deafening Silence from the Cybersecurity Industry

#25
post #21

It seems that the idea that someone could be motivated simply by having integrity, valuing honesty and pride in simply "doing their job" correctly is so alien to the current US administration that they see political motives everywhere and in everyone's actions. The fact that people with such a cynical and amoral worldview wield so much power not only in US but globally and are willing to wield that power in capriciou…

To a certain extent this is a result of living in a media ecosystem where most of the population doesn’t actually see an unbiased reporting of facts but whatever is shown to them by certain right wing news networks. But I do agree at some point people need to take responsibility for their information diet.

Fwiw media manipulation of American opinion isn’t new, its been a huge part of how America works since at least the Spanish American war of 1896.

Re: Deafening Silence from the Cybersecurity Industry

#27
post #7

My experience is that everyone who's not close to any of these impacts is apathetic or treating events like they're reality TV, and even light attempts at convincing that there's more going on and that we might be in a historic and bad situation is met with hostility as if you just told someone's small kid that Santa isn't real. At best they care about the financial parts of the news.

Some of us are scared shitless but have been called hysterical for years. Some of us emigrated.

Re: Deafening Silence from the Cybersecurity Industry

#28
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thank you for posting the link. Should have been part of the article. WTF? Black is white, and white is black.

https://web.archive.org/web/20250130231413/https://www.cisa.... Here's an article supposedly of Krebs provenance, which implicitly lumps Trump himself in as a "malicious actor". > can lead to uncertainty in the minds of voters; uncertainty that can be exploited by malicious actors Maybe not something I would want said or repeated by my administration either, disregarding the veracity. There's no date or byline either…

A downvote seems insufficient but I'm really lost for words at how to even reply to this. The tone of reasonableness while posting absolute bonkers insanity is alarming.

Re: Deafening Silence from the Cybersecurity Industry

#29

We are not "silent", we're just not being heard. Those are not the same things. You'll find plenty of critique and analysis, anticipating and commenting on the unfolding cybsersecurity calamity [0,1,2] ... [0] https://www.schneier.com/ [1] https://cybershow.uk/blog/ [2] https://www.dataandpolitics.net/trump-is-a-critical-vulnerab... When those who own and control the means of discourse are donors to, and so in collus…

Another one [0] SpyCast - DOGE Layoffs and the Counterintelligence Threats They Pose Also on their podcast RSS, but it seems they haven't added a webpage to link to for that individual show

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=foLsTVQwBIg

Post reply on HN