Live data from Hacker News

How you eat corn on the cob predicts whether you're an analyst or algebraist

bentilly.blogspot.com

21–30 of 106 posts

Re: How you eat corn on the cob predicts whether you're an analyst or algebraist

#21
post #10

Hehe, I'm on both sides and it shows in all three directions. I like all areas of math once I get to know them, and I'm currently rolling numerical computation tools in Haskell :p (as my job! its pretty great. shoot me an email if that sound fun and you'd like to learn more ) Great silly post to end the day with

I like the algebra side, love emacs, and am currently thoroughly enjoying learning lisp. I eat my corn in rows :) Was a fun read!

everybody wins!

Re: How you eat corn on the cob predicts whether you're an analyst or algebraist

#22

I eat in both spirals and in rows. Sometimes sticking with one method all the way through, sometimes alternating along the way. Additionally, sometimes I take great care to cleanly peck each and every kernel out of its socket. Other times I mow through it like a wild animal, bits of corn strewn around my mouth. I have always loved math, and I always want to dive in deeper, but can never quite figure out exactly what…

round robin all of them!

Re: How you eat corn on the cob predicts whether you're an analyst or algebraist

#27
post #12

This is the kind of article that makes me love HN. While I'm not a mathematician, I was a math major. I always preferred algebra, and sure enough I eat my corn in rows - so one more data point!

For me, it's the opposite. Maybe I actually prefer analysis to algebra, or I'm eating my corn wrong :)

As an algebraist who would be classified under "spirals" here I just think the corn looks more interesting if I leave bands of kernels in the first pass and then pick them up in the second. Definitely sounds like a more algebraist-focused reason for it, too :)

Re: How you eat corn on the cob predicts whether you're an analyst or algebraist

#30
I eat my corn in rings, fix a z and then scrape through theta before choosing the next z. It's efficient and it sort-of follows the cornkernel grid.

I'm also more of a statistician who edits in vi and emacs every day and I'm challenging myself with some category theory and abstract algebra because I find it intoxicating.

So, I don't have a clue how to fit into this divide.

Post reply on HN