Live data from Hacker News

Evidence of 22,000-year-old vehicles found at White Sands National Park

sfgate.com

41–47 of 47 posts

Re: Evidence of 22,000-year-old vehicles found at White Sands National Park

#41
post #20

Vehical is a stretch...

Which is why they went with vehicle instead. A travois is a vehicle, absolutely.

spelling was never my thing, but show me one person who's first mental image is a travois when they read vehicle. That being said... it's still pretty interesting :)

Re: Evidence of 22,000-year-old vehicles found at White Sands National Park

#42
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which is why they went with vehicle instead. A travois is a vehicle, absolutely.

spelling was never my thing, but show me one person who's first mental image is a travois when they read vehicle. That being said... it's still pretty interesting :)

> show me one person who's first mental image is a travois when they read vehicle.

I expect most wouldn't have the familiarity required to have that specific mental image, but perhaps something equally primitive? It is not like they would think there was a 22,000-year-old Lamborghini.

Re: Evidence of 22,000-year-old vehicles found at White Sands National Park

#43
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

spelling was never my thing, but show me one person who's first mental image is a travois when they read vehicle. That being said... it's still pretty interesting :)

> show me one person who's first mental image is a travois when they read vehicle. I expect most wouldn't have the familiarity required to have that specific mental image, but perhaps something equally primitive? It is not like they would think there was a 22,000-year-old Lamborghini.

I think the critism is that it sounds like some ancient aliens type of thing, but in fact its an interesting and dorky article about a cool discovery.

Re: Evidence of 22,000-year-old vehicles found at White Sands National Park

#44
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> show me one person who's first mental image is a travois when they read vehicle. I expect most wouldn't have the familiarity required to have that specific mental image, but perhaps something equally primitive? It is not like they would think there was a 22,000-year-old Lamborghini.

I think the critism is that it sounds like some ancient aliens type of thing, but in fact its an interesting and dorky article about a cool discovery.

If it were an ancient aliens type thing, don't you think the language would want to draw your attention in that direction? Like "...22,000-year-old spacecraft found..."

Re: Evidence of 22,000-year-old vehicles found at White Sands National Park

#46

Very cool, but I thought this was going to be ancient-technology bullshit. I'd love to see quotes around "vehicle", or a different word.

>I'd love to see quotes around "vehicle", or a different word.

I question why you, and so many others here, are so hung up the use of the word vehicle. Even if you weren't aware of the usage of drag type vehicles in the early Americas, you would at least envision something like a wagon, right? Or do you automatically assume vehicle is only self-propelled things like modern cars?

Post reply on HN