Ask HN: Do you still use search engines?
71–80 of 609 posts
Re: Ask HN: Do you still use search engines?
#72Re: Ask HN: Do you still use search engines?
#73Re: Ask HN: Do you still use search engines?
#74Re: Ask HN: Do you still use search engines?
#75Search is for finding specific websites and products. Totally different things.
Re: Ask HN: Do you still use search engines?
#76Yes, I'm still using Google as I haven't found LLMs useful as a search engine replacement.
Re: Ask HN: Do you still use search engines?
#77I use DuckDuckGo, with the occasional reddit !g appended if I'm looking for something experience-based. For me, searches fall into one of three categories, none of which are a good fit for LLMs: 1. A single business, location, object, or concept (I really just want the Google Maps or Wikipedia page, and I'm too lazy to go straight to the site). For these queries, LLMs are either overkill or outdated. 2. Product revie…
In response to the final sentence, you can work around this by breaking your problem or question down into smaller pieces. Essentially forcing it to reason, manually.
Re: Ask HN: Do you still use search engines?
#78Re: Ask HN: Do you still use search engines?
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
> If you have to click or browse several results forget it, makes no sense not to use an LLM that provides sources. I just searched for "What is inherit_errexit?" at Perplexity. Eight sources were provided and none of them were the most authoritative source, which is this page in the Bash manual: https://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/html_node/The-Shopt... Whereas, when I searched for "inherit_errexit" using Googl…
Why would you even search for that out of the context of the IDE where you're coding or writing documentation? If you're writing bash you'd have all those man pages loaded in context for it to answer questions and generate code properly.
Or I can just go to DDG/Google, and be done with it. No need to pre-load my "search engine" with context to get results.