Live data from Hacker News

Meta got caught gaming AI benchmarks

theverge.com

11–20 of 171 posts

Re: Meta got caught gaming AI benchmarks

#11

Is LMArena junk now? I thought there was an aspect where you run two models on the same user-supplied query. Surely this can't be gamed? > “optimized for conversationality” I don't understand what that means - how it gives it an LMArena advantage.

LMArena was always junk. I work in this space and while the media takes it seriously most scientists don't.

Random people ask random stuff and then it measures how good they feel. This is only a worthwhile evaluation if you're Google or Meta or OpenAI and you need to make a chartbot that keeps people coming back. It doesn't measure anything else useful.

Re: Meta got caught gaming AI benchmarks

#13

Is LMArena junk now? I thought there was an aspect where you run two models on the same user-supplied query. Surely this can't be gamed? > “optimized for conversationality” I don't understand what that means - how it gives it an LMArena advantage.

LMArena was always junk. I work in this space and while the media takes it seriously most scientists don't. Random people ask random stuff and then it measures how good they feel. This is only a worthwhile evaluation if you're Google or Meta or OpenAI and you need to make a chartbot that keeps people coming back. It doesn't measure anything else useful.

Conversation is a two-way street. A good conversation mechanic could elicit better interaction from the users and result in better answers. Stands to reason, anyway.
Post reply on HN