Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

CERN scientists find evidence of quantum entanglement in sheep

home.cern

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

41–50 of 123 posts

Re: CERN scientists find evidence of quantum entanglement in sheep

#41

Post by unsupp0rted »

esnard wrote: post #34
unsupp0rted wrote: post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'd rather not go into detail, but in short they sent an official email from their real noreply address, "signed" by their CEO, saying my data has been compromised. "What Data?"... Click the link... Just kidding, April Fools you stupid moron. I replied that they've lost a customer. They replied with a link to talk to their AI bot.

Is this the VPN you're talking about? https://www.reddit.com/r/Windscribe/comments/1jovk03/weve_he...

I wouldn't want to specify which VPN Provider it was, but I will say the fake in my case was not obvious, by layman standards nor by HN standards.

Re: CERN scientists find evidence of quantum entanglement in sheep

#46

Post by MisterTea »

qwertox wrote: post #35
perihelions wrote: post #9

I'm not sure what's supposed to be publication-worthy here. This is common knowledge for anyone who's ever interacted with sheep on a farm, in their natural, fermionic superfluid state. If you turn over a sheep and tickle its ticklish underbelly, you get a sheep-laugh (a hilarious sound) only about 50% of the time; the other 50%, you'll hear a sheep laughing from the opposite end of the meadow. Because, you cannot de…

It's interesting that they noticed it right in the vicinity of the LHC, maybe this hints at some kind of leak? The one in my garden always watches me through the window then I turn on the vacuum, so maybe it's feeling some kind of oddity with the electric motor. It's an old 3500 Watts one, which is now illegal to sell, and badly shielded.

> It's an old 3500 Watts one

That's a stupid big motor for a vacuum. What was it made to vacuum up, bowling balls? Boulders? Neutron star dust? (Seriously though, I'd like to know the model to check it out)

Re: CERN scientists find evidence of quantum entanglement in sheep

#47

Post by HPsquared »

stochastician wrote: post #27
perihelions wrote: post #9

I'm not sure what's supposed to be publication-worthy here. This is common knowledge for anyone who's ever interacted with sheep on a farm, in their natural, fermionic superfluid state. If you turn over a sheep and tickle its ticklish underbelly, you get a sheep-laugh (a hilarious sound) only about 50% of the time; the other 50%, you'll hear a sheep laughing from the opposite end of the meadow. Because, you cannot de…

I am somewhat rusty on my undergrad quantum, but I'm not entirely sure I agree with this analysis. Could you perhaps explain it more clearly in baa-ket notation?

I can try, but I'll need a pen.

Re: CERN scientists find evidence of quantum entanglement in sheep

#49

Post by Calwestjobs »

jcranmer wrote: post #36
robin_reala wrote: post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe review the last 25 years? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_fundamental_physic...

That's all experimental physics, not theoretical physics.

Well topological order sound like april first to me. Emergent gravity looks to me million times more plausible then that mess :)
Post reply on HN