Live data from Hacker News

ToS;DR — TL;DR for Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

tos-dr.info

1–10 of 131 posts

Re: ToS;DR — TL;DR for Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

#2
I have been thinking about doing something similar for quite sometime now. Specifically I wanted to build a browser extension that highlights only the important parts of agreement. And the important points will in turn be decided by the community of users with the system keeping track of different versions of agreements and data of interest in it.

Re: ToS;DR — TL;DR for Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

#3
post #2

I have been thinking about doing something similar for quite sometime now. Specifically I wanted to build a browser extension that highlights only the important parts of agreement. And the important points will in turn be decided by the community of users with the system keeping track of different versions of agreements and data of interest in it.

There's an issue for that. https://github.com/unhosted/ToS-DR/issues/11

Re: ToS;DR — TL;DR for Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

#4
It seems idealistic, but a service like this would be incredibly insightful. I only "read" (read: skim) the TOS of a select few companies (Apple, for one), so the high-level summaries shown on this landing page are immensely valuable (though the scoring system seems obtuse). Of course, now one has to worry about the objectivity of the summarizers.

Re: ToS;DR — TL;DR for Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

#6
Fantastic to have. It is really hard for companies to offer simply legal terms, since any simplification starts to undermine the actual detailed terms. Awesome to have this from a third party.

I imagine this would be particularly valuable as a browser extension.

Re: ToS;DR — TL;DR for Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

#7
post #4

It seems idealistic, but a service like this would be incredibly insightful. I only "read" (read: skim) the TOS of a select few companies (Apple, for one), so the high-level summaries shown on this landing page are immensely valuable (though the scoring system seems obtuse). Of course, now one has to worry about the objectivity of the summarizers.

Yes, trust is one problem. I think we're being objective (at least we are trying, with building a scoring system that's automatic). But for sure, we are not being neutral. We do think that tracking should always be opt-in, not opt-out.

At least, we're working in total transparency and it's an open process. I hope that helps.

Post reply on HN