21–30 of 47 posts
This guy must have some strong connections to get this sort of coverage out of an AI wrapper + a few gimmicky twitter posts
It isn’t that he made AI wrapper, it’s that he pointed out the king has no clothes with it.
I really feel like this guy is paying for placement and articles about himself. Just today, I've seen a twitter thread and this post. Searching for him also shows a Gizmodo article from today. And it really seems to be a case of trying to stir controversy for engagement.
I didn't follow him then but he kept coming up in my feed and there was something about his focus and message that seemed as amusing and sincere as it was egotistical and immature.
Now I'm still not convinced of his angelic qualities but more sympathetic to his mission and at least a little of his showboating seems courageous.
This guy must have some strong connections to get this sort of coverage out of an AI wrapper + a few gimmicky twitter posts
He parlayed his AI wrapper into fooling Amazon into a prized job offer by gaming an unpopular algorithmic interview technique. It isn’t that he made AI wrapper, it’s that he pointed out the king has no clothes with it.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
He parlayed his AI wrapper into fooling Amazon into a prized job offer by gaming an unpopular algorithmic interview technique. It isn’t that he made AI wrapper, it’s that he pointed out the king has no clothes with it.
"If I cheat I can get high score" does not mean the king has no clothes.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
He parlayed his AI wrapper into fooling Amazon into a prized job offer by gaming an unpopular algorithmic interview technique. It isn’t that he made AI wrapper, it’s that he pointed out the king has no clothes with it.
"If I cheat I can get high score" does not mean the king has no clothes.
Or some alternative, there is some trusted third party monitoring the candidate.