Live data from Hacker News

You should know this before choosing Next.js

eduardoboucas.com

11–20 of 147 posts

Re: You should know this before choosing Next.js

#12
I was using next.js when they switched from the pages router to app router. I ended up just abandoning the project, the app router experience was that bad, and haven't really been keen on picking up next.js since then.

It's always seemed clear that Vercel has been, at best, OSS-ish. Trying to play both sides of claiming to be open source but also (somewhat sneakily) building a walled garden to lock users into their hosting platform.

Re: You should know this before choosing Next.js

#14
The single reason I switched from next.js was because it was taking me 6-7 seconds on a small project to see changes I made appear in the browser during development (on an M1 Max Macbook pro with 64gb of ram). This is when using the app router, where every change requires a compilation step.

I now just use a React SPA with Vite.

Re: You should know this before choosing Next.js

#16
post #2

I warn everyone away from next.js. Unsurprisingly V0 has a real shot at massively increasing its adoption because people don’t know any better. What are some salient counter points for choosing next.js? I see a lot of new devs not want to have to think about deployment and management of systems so that is one aspect. If you only know react I guess getting SSR without having to learn something else is a win at the cos…

There is such an exaggeration about the need/utility of SSR. Google is dead for new projects, if one is optimizing their stack based on the easiness for Google to crawl it, I think they are making a terrible architectural decision for no return. Deploying a React/JavaScript app is much easier without Next.JS.
Post reply on HN