Live data from Hacker News

Mars Curiosity's first images

mars.jpl.nasa.gov

141–150 of 176 posts

Re: Mars Curiosity's first images

#141
post #40

What are those pictures of? This one http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/workspace/apss/ORT-1... Looks like a building with a garage door on it and some random pipes sticking out.

That's a photo of the ground with the rover's shadow projected onto it by some backlighting, suggesting that the specific camera that took that photo is facing away from the sun and down towards the ground. Because there's no sky present in that shot, the exposure is set so that the ground is bright and the shadow is darker.

Meanwhile, if you look at the other photos with the horizon present (e.g. http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/raw/?rawid=RLA_39750... ), the ground is dark because in order to capture the details in the bright sky, the exposure has to be adjusted so that less total light is captured (usually by using a faster shutter speed). Otherwise, you'd blow out the sky and get no details there.

It looks like the dynamic range of these cameras is limited, so keep that in mind when looking at any photos that come out of them. Something that's bright in one shot might be extremely dark in another, depending on its relative brightness compared to other parts of the scene. Take a look at the last few rear camera shots with the sun in them:

http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/raw/?s=0

The sun causes all the sky detail from the previous rear camera shots to appear black, since its overwhelming brightness requires the exposure to be extremely brief.

Anyway, I hope that gives you a better idea of what to expect from these cameras and how to interpret the photos.

Re: Mars Curiosity's first images

#142
post #117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So the UK could have had 6 Curiosity rovers for the price of the Olympics.... NB I do think the Olympics has been a good thing - but I do wonder about the value for money....

That the price was 10 billion does not mean the cost was that. They might even make a profit since they sell the sponsorships, broadcasting rights and tickets not to mention the stimulus of the local economy. Sinking 2 billion into something that yields no direct monetary profit, that's a bold move for any country. They did not even sell broadcasting rights!

> Sinking 2 billion into something that yields no direct monetary profit, that's a bold move for any country.

Correct that there is no direct return on investment. However, some experts have claimed for every dollar spent on the Apollo program, we got $10 back in public benefit. It's really difficult to measure this stuff accurately, but the point to take away is that there is quite a lot to gained in technology, PR, and cash by doing inspiring & challenging science.

Re: Mars Curiosity's first images

#143

I took those during landing sequence.. http://i45.tinypic.com/353eemc.jpg http://i46.tinypic.com/ej95s5.png http://i49.tinypic.com/2qicoqq.png http://i50.tinypic.com/2hd8j13.png edit: its just fun to watch those. also, according to NASA there is 500,000 lines of code behind those 38 steps.. would love to see some parts of it!

State #38: "Done"

Re: Mars Curiosity's first images

#145
post #127

I took those during landing sequence.. http://i45.tinypic.com/353eemc.jpg http://i46.tinypic.com/ej95s5.png http://i49.tinypic.com/2qicoqq.png http://i50.tinypic.com/2hd8j13.png edit: its just fun to watch those. also, according to NASA there is 500,000 lines of code behind those 38 steps.. would love to see some parts of it!

Why are these not games yet? HN has dozens of people capable of creating a nice lunar lander / mars lander sim.

NASA unveiled their Mars Rover Landing game for XBOX+Kinect very recently:

* http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/video/index.cfm?id=1094

* http://marketplace.xbox.com/en-US/Product/Mars-Rover-Landing...

Re: Mars Curiosity's first images

#146
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I liked that bit. Drove home the humanity of the people who had just accomplished something that only a few thousand years ago was thought to be in the domain of gods. That we as a species have come so far but still retain our sense of self is fantastic.

I loved the humor from the MarsCuriosity Twitter account too. http://twitter.com/MarsCuriosity You could totally they were having a great time there.

My favourite one is "Cruise stage separation complete. So long & thanks for all the navigation."

Re: Mars Curiosity's first images

#147
As an aside, their Twitter account mentions that it was an observatory in Australia that was relaying the signals from Mars:

http://twitter.com/MarsCuriosity/status/232337630711382017

As it happens, it was an Australian observatory that relayed the first video of Armstrong walking on the moon. There was a fun movie made (made by the D-Generation/Working Dog guys) based on that:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dish

Re: Mars Curiosity's first images

#148
post #6

It's times like this that I think everyone can be proud to be part of the human race.

Personally, I think the tax payers of the United States deserve a round of applause from the rest of us for funding such a mission. It's not that other countries can't do this - we just don't want to pay for it...

I saw a Twitter comment during the celebration suggesting that NASA run a $30B Kickstarter to fund the first manned mission to Mars. [Setting aside legal issues] would the human race come together and pay for it? I like to think "yes", it would be a successful funding effort.

Re: Mars Curiosity's first images

#149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Do you want to sell sugared water for the rest of your life? Or do you want to come with me and change the world?"

I figured a paraphrasing along the lines of "Do you want to sell shiny phones..." or "Do you want to work on ways to share cat pictures..." would be more appropriate.

My shiny phone has added enormous value to my life. Cat pictures not so much.
Post reply on HN