Apple: Jobs to Take Medical Leave of Absence
21–30 of 114 posts
Re: Apple: Jobs to Take Medical Leave of Absence
#22Re: Apple: Jobs to Take Medical Leave of Absence
#23Not good.
Of course, 6 months may not be long enough to really tell. There's also the possibility that he really is dying and they're hiding it, or he simply plans to permanently retire, and they're just "easing" investors into the idea of an Apple without Steve Jobs. I hope neither is the case, especially the former.
Re: Apple: Jobs to Take Medical Leave of Absence
#24It's on Reuters now, too. Clever of them to wait until after the closing bell, but man oh man, that stock is going to plummet tomorrow, I imagine. Hope he's all right...
Re: Apple: Jobs to Take Medical Leave of Absence
#25It's on Reuters now, too. Clever of them to wait until after the closing bell, but man oh man, that stock is going to plummet tomorrow, I imagine. Hope he's all right...
I don't do any trading (and therefore don't own shares in Apple), but I wonder if people who have recently shorted AAPL are happy Steve Jobs is having medical problems? (Please don't downmod me because of the morbid behavior of others.)
Re: Apple: Jobs to Take Medical Leave of Absence
#26Not good.
It's certainly not good for Jobs that his health is declining, and may not be good for AAPL in the short term, but it gives Apple the opportunity to prove that Apple != Steve Jobs. If Apple can continue to kick ass for 6 months while he's gone, it indicates that Apple may do just fine once he's gone permanently. Of course, 6 months may not be long enough to really tell. There's also the possibility that he really is…
Re: Apple: Jobs to Take Medical Leave of Absence
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
"... I doubt the WSJ would publish a letter like this if it were unconfirmed. ..." Email isn't the most reliable medium and the WSJ owner is Rupert Murdoch.
Whether you like Murdoch's politics or not, the WSJ is one of the most respected newsgathering organizations in the world. They didn't blow their credibility on a fake memo. This story didn't run on the (partisan) WSJ editorial page. It ran on the front page . It's obviously true.
Calm down.
I posted the article very early and only the WSJ & CNBC reporting breaking news. No other confirmation. This isn't about politics, it's exercising skepticism until the news is confirmed by a number of sources.
Re: Apple: Jobs to Take Medical Leave of Absence
#28Re: Apple: Jobs to Take Medical Leave of Absence
#29It's on Reuters now, too. Clever of them to wait until after the closing bell, but man oh man, that stock is going to plummet tomorrow, I imagine. Hope he's all right...
I don't do any trading (and therefore don't own shares in Apple), but I wonder if people who have recently shorted AAPL are happy Steve Jobs is having medical problems? (Please don't downmod me because of the morbid behavior of others.)
Re: Apple: Jobs to Take Medical Leave of Absence
#30"... Apple CEO Steve Jobs today sent the following email to all Apple employees ..." Don't see anything on the Apple pr site yet ~ http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2009/01/ So it's unconfirmed.
It's there now: http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2009/01/14advisory.html
Thats what I'm looking for, Apple confirmation.