Scientists break down plastic using a simple, inexpensive catalyst and air
1–10 of 113 posts
Re: Scientists break down plastic using a simple, inexpensive catalyst and air
#2Re: Scientists break down plastic using a simple, inexpensive catalyst and air
#3Re: Scientists break down plastic using a simple, inexpensive catalyst and air
#4Well, they used a "simple, inexpensive catalyst" and then HEATED the plastic/catalyst mysture. Nowhere in the article it gives you an estimate of the final cost of the process.
Actually, the tap water is optional.
And instead of monomers, the end product is carbon - which is even more recyclable!
Re: Scientists break down plastic using a simple, inexpensive catalyst and air
#5Well, they used a "simple, inexpensive catalyst" and then HEATED the plastic/catalyst mysture. Nowhere in the article it gives you an estimate of the final cost of the process.
> Catalytic amounts of AC/MoO2 selectively convert waste PET into its monomer, terephthalic acid (TPA), within 4 h at 265 °C with yields as high as 94% under 1 atm air.
I'm not a chemist so don't know if you can find a way to calculate the cost, but the authors claim that it's cheaper than current methods.
The bigger deal imo is that it recovers PET monomers from mixed plastics, which means avoiding manufacturing more plastic.
Re: Scientists break down plastic using a simple, inexpensive catalyst and air
#6Well, they used a "simple, inexpensive catalyst" and then HEATED the plastic/catalyst mysture. Nowhere in the article it gives you an estimate of the final cost of the process.
The journal article is open access. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/gc/d4gc0... > Catalytic amounts of AC/MoO2 selectively convert waste PET into its monomer, terephthalic acid (TPA), within 4 h at 265 °C with yields as high as 94% under 1 atm air. I'm not a chemist so don't know if you can find a way to calculate the cost, but the authors claim that it's cheaper than current methods. The bigger d…
I think most recycling methods for PET require melting anyway.
Re: Scientists break down plastic using a simple, inexpensive catalyst and air
#7Well, they used a "simple, inexpensive catalyst" and then HEATED the plastic/catalyst mysture. Nowhere in the article it gives you an estimate of the final cost of the process.
The journal article is open access. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/gc/d4gc0... > Catalytic amounts of AC/MoO2 selectively convert waste PET into its monomer, terephthalic acid (TPA), within 4 h at 265 °C with yields as high as 94% under 1 atm air. I'm not a chemist so don't know if you can find a way to calculate the cost, but the authors claim that it's cheaper than current methods. The bigger d…
The thing is BTX chemicals and other precursors of mass produced plastics cost about 50 cents a pound which makes it hard for any kind of recycling process to be competitive.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BTX_(chemistry)
Re: Scientists break down plastic using a simple, inexpensive catalyst and air
#8Well, they used a "simple, inexpensive catalyst" and then HEATED the plastic/catalyst mysture. Nowhere in the article it gives you an estimate of the final cost of the process.
The journal article is open access. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/gc/d4gc0... > Catalytic amounts of AC/MoO2 selectively convert waste PET into its monomer, terephthalic acid (TPA), within 4 h at 265 °C with yields as high as 94% under 1 atm air. I'm not a chemist so don't know if you can find a way to calculate the cost, but the authors claim that it's cheaper than current methods. The bigger d…