Live data from Hacker News

Dutch Parliament: Time to ditch US tech for homegrown options

theregister.com

51–60 of 303 posts

Re: Dutch Parliament: Time to ditch US tech for homegrown options

#51
post #29

> Dutch MP Barbara Kathmann, author of four of the motions, told The Register. "If we continue outsourcing all of our digital infrastructure to billionaires that would rather escape Earth by building space rockets, there will be no Dutch expertise left." This kind of casual anti-technology attitude among European politicians is part of the reason we are in this mess.

You may not agree with the sentiment, but the quote isn't anti-technology. It doesn't say that "escaping Earth" is an inherently bad thing, it simply highlights the perils of outsourcing digital infrastructure to certain billionaires who wish to do so. Which is a valid concern.

The implication is that "building space rockets to escape Earth" is bad.

Re: Dutch Parliament: Time to ditch US tech for homegrown options

#52
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Chastising developing space tech?

They appear to be chastising the billionaires, not the space tech. Chastising space tech would not fit in with the argument they are advancing about the need to adopt local tech. However, chastising the US billionaires definitely supports their argument.

I can read what was said without your interpretation of it.

Fast forward 20 years and Europeans will be hopelessly dependent on SpaceX just like they are on big tech now.

They're billionaires because they invested in tech that the whole world is dependent on now. Chastising them shows that European technophobic bureaucrats still don't get it.

Re: Dutch Parliament: Time to ditch US tech for homegrown options

#53

> Dutch MP Barbara Kathmann, author of four of the motions, told The Register. "If we continue outsourcing all of our digital infrastructure to billionaires that would rather escape Earth by building space rockets, there will be no Dutch expertise left." This kind of casual anti-technology attitude among European politicians is part of the reason we are in this mess.

Anti-technology is just a dog whistle for anti-capital. Billionaires have made things exceptionally worse. Facebook was started as a way to rate women’s faces, is the foundation our data collection industry is built off of. We need to tear down the entire system and rebuild something else.

I still can't even see what supposed anti-technology content there is in the quote. But perhaps there's a broader context to incorporate that those from Europe could explain to Americans?

Re: Dutch Parliament: Time to ditch US tech for homegrown options

#55
post #38

Called it, again . Data sovereignty is the true trend of the next decade. Not Quantum, not AI, but the new multi-pole world order divesting from Americentric technologies and back into the sort of locally-grown economies that children of the Cold War would be familiar with. Local vendors serving local needs with a focus on regional, not global, scale and service. Us Cassandra types have been screaming for years that…

While I don't like the politics giving rise to this, de-globalization combined with the great social media unbundling and other trends means we might finally see decentralization be a major trend (outside of the cryptocurrency ghetto). Overall I think this is a good thing. It could mean the end of the monolithic closed SaaS era, which is the absolute worst possible model for software if you care about privacy or any…

I would guess that for the most part we won’t have “true” decentralization, but given the EU has mandated interoperability between big providers like Apple and Facebook I can imagine that we will eventually have major services that are EU centric (either in certain markets or most/all of the EU), and there will be ways for people to use their own setup as well (basically multi polar distribution, plus the ability for someone to do it themselves).

Re: Dutch Parliament: Time to ditch US tech for homegrown options

#56

I am curious if this post will be deleted by the moderators, like the last time a discussion about European tech sovereignty was brought up on this American website.

They don't remove posts that discuss European tech sovereignty. It was probably flagged by the community instead.

Everything that can be connected in a negative way to the current government gets flagged, so this will probably get flagged soon too.

Re: Dutch Parliament: Time to ditch US tech for homegrown options

#57

I am curious if this post will be deleted by the moderators, like the last time a discussion about European tech sovereignty was brought up on this American website.

They don't remove posts that discuss European tech sovereignty. It was probably flagged by the community instead.

This feature has definitely been abused by fans of the current US administration. Anything close to being critical gets flagged and needs manual intervention to be brought back.

Re: Dutch Parliament: Time to ditch US tech for homegrown options

#58

I mean, ok, fine guys but this is just more empty gestures from a club of empty heads in the GroenLinks/PvdA clown-car. I don't recall that they were against (in fact they were in favour) of the removal of the 30% tax rules intended to attract expats in, among other things, tech businesses. I don't recall that they've ever done or said anything to make the country a more attractive place to start or grow a business o…

It sounds like you have a bone to pick with GL, which is totally fair. But do you have any thoughts on the proposal itself?

It's fine but a proposal to do something without the political will to make any of the difficult compromises required to achieve them is meaningless.

Re: Dutch Parliament: Time to ditch US tech for homegrown options

#60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No. The main reason we got in this mess is because the US is a better market for startups, simply because of the amount of available money, and the fact that it’s easier to start in a market with 340M people who speak the same language.

Also yes, because it's easier to start in a jurisdiction with sane laws and bearable tax burden, none of which is available in the EU. EU is indeed drowning in mind boggling bureaucracy. Source: am a startup in the EU.

If it was merely about taxes and regulations then nobody would want to choose California over almost any other state for their startup.
Post reply on HN