Earlier quoted context omitted.
If we had done as well as the places that were careful there would be about 1 million more Americans now than there actually are. But most of them were costs to society, not producers, and thus killing them was a win for the Republicans. (Although I don't think we had a chance of doing as well because it got here earlier.)
You can repeat that narrative all you want but it was always a bad one and became really stale, really fast. Observing regions, countries and comparing when they didn't perform the hygiene theater really showed your measures had little effect (as expected). The fudging of numbers and bad faith also made things hard to argue. The fact that you're all about republicans wanted to murder Americans shows how deranged you…
As for Republicans wanting them dead: do the words "We want them infected" not ring a bell? In case you've forgotten: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/16/trump-appointee-dem...
Either that was based on a delusion (how do you propose to infect only the low-risk individuals?) or the true objective was to kill off a lot of the weak. And that wasn't a one-off by a nut, there was a substantial contingent of conservatives who wanted that approach. Simply ignoring it would have been callous, but wanting them infected is intent.