Live data from Hacker News

Crew-9 Returns to Earth

spacex.com

131–140 of 712 posts

Re: Crew-9 Returns to Earth

#131
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've heard rumors that SpaceX suggested another mission to bring them back earlier, but as it would only have been a couple of months earlier NASA very sensibly declined (not worth >100 million to reduce their time in space by a third). Know if there's anything to that? Might explain some of the odd rhetoric.

SpaceX offered to do it for free. Publicly.

"free".

Elon Musk offers a lot of things for free, and then turns out you have to pay anyway.

Re: Crew-9 Returns to Earth

#132

Eric Berger has a good summary on the narrative: https://arstechnica.com/space/2025/03/can-nasa-remain-nonpar...

"Just what those political reasons were never specified. But the basic message was clear: Biden, bad; Trump, good" Bullshit. Musk was clear that the reason was that they didn't want someone pro trump having success so close to the election.

Musk says a lot of things. Naivety is on display when you accept them without skepticism.

Re: Crew-9 Returns to Earth

#135
post #102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When was space not political?

When rescuing astronauts stranded on the ISS, one would expect. I can't imagine any other president using that as an opportunity to explicitly bash his predecessor. Can you?

Nobody was stranded.

Re: Crew-9 Returns to Earth

#136

They should make a movie about this, it was all fun we were going to space for 8 days and stayed for 9 MONTHS STRANDED NO WAY BACK HOME. i felt so bad for them honestly. Glad they’re safe and home now.

Nobody was stranded. It's amazing how effective lying to people has become.

Re: Crew-9 Returns to Earth

#137
post #86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Berger is an excellent journalist. He’s very knowledgeable about space topics, has good sources, and has been extremely fair to Musk in the past. When he says it’s a “throne of lies”, a line has been crossed.

I wasn't very convinced by his arguments - the main one being: Senior NASA officials earlier this month confirmed, publicly and on the record, that the decision was made by the space agency in the best interests of the International Space Station Program. Not for political reasons. To be a little snarky here - so Senior NASA officials: honest, Musk: liar? If, hypothetically, NASA was pressured for political reasons,…

NASA, the pork factory, not impartial? Impossible!

Re: Crew-9 Returns to Earth

#138

They should make a movie about this, it was all fun we were going to space for 8 days and stayed for 9 MONTHS STRANDED NO WAY BACK HOME. i felt so bad for them honestly. Glad they’re safe and home now.

They had a way back home if they needed to. They just didn't have a ride up for their replacements for a few months, so they asked them to stay longer to keep the ISS mission going. Becoming a NASA astronaut is extremely hard. You have to check a ridiculous number of boxes, and you have to really want it. I think anyone who goes through this process would prefer a 6 month stay on the space station over a 2 week stay…

I think the only people who can say they'd prefer an unexpected 9 month stay vs a planned 2 week stay are the ones that were "asked" to stay, and no one else.

Feels like they've been put between a wall and a sword: either they abandon the ISS or come back home. I don't know how I'd feel about that.

Re: Crew-9 Returns to Earth

#139
> Kate Tice, an engineer from SpaceX on the webcast, noted that touchdown was imminent. "We're going to stand by for splashdown located in the Gulf of America," she said. Ah, yes. The Gulf of America. This is why we can't have nice things.

Haha you got to love the timeline we're living at.

Post reply on HN