Live data from Hacker News

Apple will soon support encrypted RCS messaging with Android users

theverge.com

141–150 of 270 posts

Re: Apple will soon support encrypted RCS messaging with Android users

#141
post #136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ads? Where? There's no spot in Google Messages for them.

Not on the Google Messages app itself, but inside the messages. Just like spam promotional emails.

Emails??

Re: Apple will soon support encrypted RCS messaging with Android users

#142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What features? The only two features I can think of that iMessage has which discord/whatsapp/etc don't are: 1. Automatically can flip to "do not disturb" mode when my phone is in sleep mode, and display that notice to my companion. Other chat apps require manually configuring that I think. I also suspect apple doesn't provide an API to make this easily possible for other apps. 2. iMessage makes it easy to identify th…

You don't work with non-techie adults, do you? They use iMessage with their family and friends. They use it at work too. Some of their friends, and maybe some of their family, work at the same place. I can try to convince 11 other people who are my business partners to switch to, say, Signal. A special app used only for our group communications. Or I can buy an iPhone. I chose the latter. It's not my choice. I'm maki…

All the non-tech people in every non-US country have whatsapp/telegram/wechat/line/kakao installed (depending on the country), and it seems to work fine.

It's just the US that has picked a universal messenger that doesn't work on android, every other country, the vast majority of the planet, defaults to a cross-platform phone messenger app.

In short, consider moving to europe.

Re: Apple will soon support encrypted RCS messaging with Android users

#143
post #133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have never seen a reaction that helped. "OK" is short, it's in plain text, and it works easily. I don't need your thumbs up. Or your like. You want to emoji, go ahead, but I'm getting older and I can't zoom in on them without blowing up general text to the same size. With more complex emoji I have to screenshot the text and then pull up the image to zoom on it to even tell what it is. I'd silence the conversation,…

You admit that you’re getting older, and I think that’s part of the disconnect with emojis. OK does not convey the same thing. You’re talking about having to zoom in to see the emoji, and the younger crowd already has every one memorized. The reactions may not help you but I’d say for most of us, they do help.

> OK does not convey the same thing.

Fine. Is "10-4" or "copy that" or "Roger" acceptable? Because the whole point of that text, in a work context (and this is always a work conversation; I like my partners but I'm not personal friends with them), is to convey "I have received your message". And a reaction generates an SMS that is, until you realize what it is, kind of incomprehensible. "Loved '[my comment]'" makes no sense when you get it as a long comment.

> The reactions may not help you

I have trouble seeing how they help anyone. You made an obvious joke. A guy who laughs at anything reacts "HA-HA!!" or whatever. What is the contribution? The youngest member of my partnership is 40, though we do have a 33-year-old joining in a few months.

This isn't "get off my lawn", much as I do love that. It's "explain to me how it's useful for actual minute-to-minute work". I'm a physician. An anesthesiologist. I never know when the next emergency will arise, but OTOH we don't go for a sterile cockpit approach because there are a lot of conversations that have to do with the running of the day at work that aren't entirely serious (and don't involve patient care, as such; that's why we don't use the sterile cockpit method - it's more about figuring out who can let whom go to lunch, becuase you can't just leave someone under anesthesia to go eat, or how we might be able to let Dr. X operate in about an hour - personnel management is the biggest part of my on-call duties).

Re: Apple will soon support encrypted RCS messaging with Android users

#144

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have never seen a reaction that helped. "OK" is short, it's in plain text, and it works easily. I don't need your thumbs up. Or your like. You want to emoji, go ahead, but I'm getting older and I can't zoom in on them without blowing up general text to the same size. With more complex emoji I have to screenshot the text and then pull up the image to zoom on it to even tell what it is. I'd silence the conversation,…

> I'd silence the conversation, except that iMessage won't let you have two identical groups with exactly the same members. So both humorous and serious stuff goes into the same group chat, and it's often very time-sensitive if serious Really? That's insane, so that means that 3rd party messaging apps literally have better UX than first party ones, as I have lots of groups with the same members for different things.

I don't believe this is true, but you do have to give one of the iMessage groups a name to make it independent from another group. If you imagine that primary key for a group is its name, and the default name for a group is its participants, this does kind of make sense.

Re: Apple will soon support encrypted RCS messaging with Android users

#145

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What features? The only two features I can think of that iMessage has which discord/whatsapp/etc don't are: 1. Automatically can flip to "do not disturb" mode when my phone is in sleep mode, and display that notice to my companion. Other chat apps require manually configuring that I think. I also suspect apple doesn't provide an API to make this easily possible for other apps. 2. iMessage makes it easy to identify th…

> iMessage makes it easy to identify the poors, the android users, and ignore them. I hope this is sarcasm, and you're not actually that narrow minded. It is an interesting complete marketing victory in the US by Apple though, that there is a widespread perception that you would only have an Android if you couldn't afford an iPhone. I've had an iPhone for work, it's fine. I much prefer Android and I'll stick to it, a…

iMessage's killer feature is that you can send a group message to more than a total of ten people. SMS does not officially support this.

I do not recall this being a problem in the pre-iMessage days, even with flip phones. I was on prepaid T-Mobile and had to pay for every message I received, which is the one place where I thought the US billing system had gone nuts - you could always decline to receive a phone call, knowing the number, but you can't refuse a text. I was surprised that nobody ever abused that, but they never did so on a large scale. At ten cents per text, sent or received, you communicated when you needed to, or when you had something to contribute, but one minute of voice was the same cost. One sent and one received text cost as much as two minutes of talk, which can convey a lot more information.

Re: Apple will soon support encrypted RCS messaging with Android users

#146
post #78

Well... they also need to expand to more than just a few countries. Here in Brazil there's no iPhone RCS support at all.

It's up to the mobile networks to support that (usually by outsourcing it to Google, which I'm not sure they do for free).

It's weird it's taking that long, as RCS on Android have been supported for ages here, I think even before some US carriers.

I first tried RCS in early 2019.

Re: Apple will soon support encrypted RCS messaging with Android users

#147

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not on the Google Messages app itself, but inside the messages. Just like spam promotional emails.

Emails??

Rampant spam has forced Google to turn off RCS ads in India[0]

[0] https://www.theverge.com/2022/6/1/23150243/google-rcs-ads-in...

Re: Apple will soon support encrypted RCS messaging with Android users

#148
post #136

When I enabled RCS on my Android, I started getting ads with rich media. So I disabled it. And moreover WhatsApp is the dominant messaging app in my country. So this doesn't matter.

Ads? Where? There's no spot in Google Messages for them.

Rampant spam has forced Google to turn off RCS ads in India[0]

[0] https://www.theverge.com/2022/6/1/23150243/google-rcs-ads-in...

Re: Apple will soon support encrypted RCS messaging with Android users

#149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It definitely sounds like a technical one if you can't make two groups, one for banter and one for serious talk so you can mute banter when it's not appropriate. How are other people supposed to know that it's not okay for you right now because you are at dinner?

We all live in the same metro area. You might eat as early as five, you might finish as late as nine. But if you're going to use the business group, it should be about business. Banter is fine during working hours. People get lazy and just use the "whole group" message rather than send it to those who are working today. And it's much like my problems with Android vs iOS: there are twelve people in this group, eleven…

Have you considered using something like Slack or Discord or (can’t believe I’m suggesting this) Teams, all of which sound like they’d be more suited to your use case?

This does not sound like an impossible stretch, works on more device types, and in the case of Slack or Teams can also be configured for HIPAA compliance (which while you don’t call it out, seems like it may be useful). Tens of millions of people use a chat system for work distinct from their personal friend groups, even if the venn diagram is a circle.

Re: Apple will soon support encrypted RCS messaging with Android users

#150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> iMessage makes it easy to identify the poors, the android users, and ignore them. I hope this is sarcasm, and you're not actually that narrow minded. It is an interesting complete marketing victory in the US by Apple though, that there is a widespread perception that you would only have an Android if you couldn't afford an iPhone. I've had an iPhone for work, it's fine. I much prefer Android and I'll stick to it, a…

iMessage's killer feature is that you can send a group message to more than a total of ten people. SMS does not officially support this. I do not recall this being a problem in the pre-iMessage days, even with flip phones. I was on prepaid T-Mobile and had to pay for every message I received , which is the one place where I thought the US billing system had gone nuts - you could always decline to receive a phone call…

I can't remember the last time I sent an SMS. Comparing iMessage to SMS is not useful. Compare it to one of the (several) cross platform messaging services.

In Europe, Android is on equal par with Apple. WhatsApp is the default messaging service - it is universally installed among my friends, relatives, colleagues, contractors etc.. No-one cares what model of phone the other person has. Everyone communicates.

Post reply on HN