Live data from Hacker News

Bluesky quickly sold out of the T-shirt its CEO wore to troll Mark Zuckerberg

techcrunch.com

11–20 of 94 posts

Re: Bluesky quickly sold out of the T-shirt its CEO wore to troll Mark Zuckerberg

#13

[flagged]

They don't make the shirts themselves. They ordered a finite number from a supplier. They're not claiming that the world is out of potential to make new shirts.

So you're saying this is a marketing piece.

Re: Bluesky quickly sold out of the T-shirt its CEO wore to troll Mark Zuckerberg

#14
post #2

> (Yes, it is weird that Zuck goes out of his way to compare himself to a violent dictator.) Why can't news sites just report the news? Why do they need to tell me what to think about it?

What bothers me about this is not injecting an opinion (it's TechCrunch) but the superficial and ignorant take. Julius Caesar was not just some "violent dictator" like a Hitler, Stalin, or Putin. He wasn't sending people off to gas chambers, gulags, or out of windows. He was famous for his clemency toward his enemies in the civil war which made him dictator. Even the title of "dictator" was a legal office in ancient…

[flagged]

Re: Bluesky quickly sold out of the T-shirt its CEO wore to troll Mark Zuckerberg

#17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They don't make the shirts themselves. They ordered a finite number from a supplier. They're not claiming that the world is out of potential to make new shirts.

So you're saying this is a marketing piece.

What company-branded shirt isn't?

Re: Bluesky quickly sold out of the T-shirt its CEO wore to troll Mark Zuckerberg

#18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They don't make the shirts themselves. They ordered a finite number from a supplier. They're not claiming that the world is out of potential to make new shirts.

So you're saying this is a marketing piece.

[dead]

Re: Bluesky quickly sold out of the T-shirt its CEO wore to troll Mark Zuckerberg

#20
post #2

> (Yes, it is weird that Zuck goes out of his way to compare himself to a violent dictator.) Why can't news sites just report the news? Why do they need to tell me what to think about it?

Because no one goes into journalism to report the news, they go into to influence public opinion. This is done largely by deciding which stories to amplify and to kill, and which information is presented in which order. That is a subtle art, this person seems to lack subtlety.
Post reply on HN