About the product itself[1], I don't think I would be comfortable with coworkers being able to glean if I'm on an IDE or Hacker News. [1] http://www.quicklychat.com/
The SmartStatus is actually fully configurable, so you can choose which applications/websites you appear red/yellow/green for. So if you set Hacker News and your IDE to the same color, then your coworkers won't be able to tell :-)
Why to auto-answer video calls
11–20 of 25 posts
Re: Why to auto-answer video calls
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
The SmartStatus is actually fully configurable, so you can choose which applications/websites you appear red/yellow/green for. So if you set Hacker News and your IDE to the same color, then your coworkers won't be able to tell :-)
Ah, thank you! For some reason, reading "Fully Customizable" on the site I didn't understand it as such. Is it possible to set (until chosen otherwise) uniformly to red/yellow/green? As in, to override the SmartStatus and use it as run of the mill IM applications without losing the settings?
Re: Why to auto-answer video calls
#13This is so contrived, it hurts...
And then, on your homepage:
This is a big part of the reason teams are much less productive when they're spread apart.
Nonsense. I've worked with many distributed teams and there simply is no correlation between productivity and location.
I don't think you're doing yourselves a favor by pushing the age old "it's just like being there"-fairytale. You can insult the intelligence of your audience like that when you're a Vodafone or a Samsung, but not when you're trying to sell a product (and likely to a largely technical audience).
The question that you have to answer on your homepage is: Why not Skype?
Do that in bold, front and center. Don't bore me with marketing lorem ipsum...
Re: Why to auto-answer video calls
#14This is the reason why if you really need your work to be done, you got to turn off your phone, cancel your meetings, stop your emails from popping-up, etc.
The effects of interruptions on productivity is now well-known. They kill it.
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/wired-success/201204/why... http://workingmoms.about.com/od/executiveopportunities/a/5-W...
Re: Why to auto-answer video calls
#15Called and got massive non-stop feedback. It's unfortunate that the complete lack of echo cancellation (skype, gtalk, etc work great for us using identical setup) makes this dead on arrival.
Re: Why to auto-answer video calls
#16Re: Why to auto-answer video calls
#17I hope it at least gives me a couple of seconds warning to get my pants on.
Re: Why to auto-answer video calls
#18I understand the problem that this approach is trying to address and whilst it is in some way a problem there are better ways. I spent less than a minute thinking of a better solution (IMHO) and that is:
You have a webcam on your desk (or remote hot vid mini desk spots) and you are permanatly logged into that. This allows the remote worker to be apart of the office and also for people to walk up and speak to them, allowing the remote worker to be seen as well as see who is approaching, instead of wam bam in your face. This also affords people to see when they are busy or not. To me this approach is better. But this and also assumes the remote worker has the bandwith to accomodate this and there not on some 3g/28.8 connection due to there location and for alot that is why they are remote working anyhow. Rememebr remote working also covers workers in different locations. I and many others I can garantee have worked in companies with more than one office in more than one location and none of them have an issue and tend to still use bridged conference calls or phone calls. Video has it's uses but it also has its distractions and overheads that can outway the task at hand.