Reverse engineering OpenAI code execution to make it run C and JavaScript
11–20 of 89 posts
Re: Reverse engineering OpenAI code execution to make it run C and JavaScript
#12Re: Reverse engineering OpenAI code execution to make it run C and JavaScript
#13[flagged]
Re: Reverse engineering OpenAI code execution to make it run C and JavaScript
#14Here is Simonw experimenting with ChatGPT and C a year ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39801938 I find ChatGPT and Claude really quite good at C.
Claude is really good at many languages, for sure, much better than GPT in my experience.
Though I like Claude's conversation style more than the other ones.
Re: Reverse engineering OpenAI code execution to make it run C and JavaScript
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
Claude is really good at many languages, for sure, much better than GPT in my experience.
I've got the feeling that Claude doesn't use its knowledge properly. I often need to ask some things it left out in the answer in order for it to realize that that should also have been part of the answer. This does not happen as often with ChatGPT or Gemini. Specially ChatGPT is good at providing a well-rounded first answer. Though I like Claude's conversation style more than the other ones.
Re: Reverse engineering OpenAI code execution to make it run C and JavaScript
#16I can't believe they're running it out of ipynb
Re: Reverse engineering OpenAI code execution to make it run C and JavaScript
#17[flagged]
Would you say the Finns are doing better as well, because Linus Torvalds was born there?
Re: Reverse engineering OpenAI code execution to make it run C and JavaScript
#18[flagged]
Re: Reverse engineering OpenAI code execution to make it run C and JavaScript
#19One weird thing - why would they be running such an old Linux?
“Their sandbox is running a really old version of linux, a Kernel from 2016.”
Re: Reverse engineering OpenAI code execution to make it run C and JavaScript
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
Claude is really good at many languages, for sure, much better than GPT in my experience.
I've got the feeling that Claude doesn't use its knowledge properly. I often need to ask some things it left out in the answer in order for it to realize that that should also have been part of the answer. This does not happen as often with ChatGPT or Gemini. Specially ChatGPT is good at providing a well-rounded first answer. Though I like Claude's conversation style more than the other ones.