Live data from Hacker News

uBlock Origin is no longer available on the Chrome Store

chromewebstore.google.com

341–350 of 1001 posts

Re: uBlock Origin is no longer available on the Chrome Store

#341
post #142

The new uBlock Origin Lite is compatible with Manifest v3 and has the featured flag on the Chrome Web Store: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ublock-origin-lite/...

Lite version works for me the same as the original. Blocks majority of ads.

Re: uBlock Origin is no longer available on the Chrome Store

#342
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Other Chromium-based browsers don’t work? That would at least save you from stuff like https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17942252 .

I haven't tried anything but Chrome/Chromium (nightly dev). Brave is my dedicated porn browser I won't use it for anything else.

Your loss. Chromium is the shittiest Chromium-based browser, basically anything else is better than the original.

Re: uBlock Origin is no longer available on the Chrome Store

#343
post #91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The issue I have is not that they did it; it’s that they lied about why. Chrome is their project, they should be free to do whatever they want with it. People can use a different browser if they wish (I do). This whole “better for users” bullshit is why I don’t respect Google as a company. Don’t piss on me and tell me it’s raining.

Their engineers genuinely believe that shit too, which is just absurd bullshit.

Perfect time to read again The Gervais Principle!

https://www.ribbonfarm.com/2009/10/07/the-gervais-principle-...

Re: uBlock Origin is no longer available on the Chrome Store

#344
post #186

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What sites don't work with FF?

I can't login to the work-paid-for version of Microsoft Copilot with Firefox, for some reason. I've had one or two others - I think they were internal CMU website tools. And even more niche: My kids took a ski lesson last year at Snowbird and the website with their report card rejected anything that didn't identify as Chrome. It _worked_ with mobile FF, but it popped up a "YOU SHOULD USE CHROME" banner and wouldn't l…

You can also disable ublock on specific 'trusted' domains.

Re: uBlock Origin is no longer available on the Chrome Store

#345
post #165

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But is less capable than uBlock origin.

Not really. 90% of users won't notice a difference. Here's the feature diff. [0] [0] https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/wiki/Frequently-as...

I've been trying uBO Lite myself for a few months, and anyone who uses YouTube will absolutely notice that it's worse at blocking. Lite tends to delay playback at the start of a video for as long as the blocked ads would've been, making the site feel slower, and once in a while an ad will slip past the blocker anyway.

Re: uBlock Origin is no longer available on the Chrome Store

#346

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Firefox and its derivatives remain the only true alternative at this point.

You can still install uBlock Origin in Brave, assuming you don't mind the crypto stuff and how they pay it out (or, rather don't) to site owners. Even Firefox feels a little weird now with the advent of Mozilla Advertising. Very much a lesser of all evils situation.

> install uBlock Origin in Brave

There's no need to do it, their built-in adblocker supports the same rule lists.

https://github.com/brave/adblock-rust

Re: uBlock Origin is no longer available on the Chrome Store

#347
post #106
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Nobody could have possibly seen it coming that Google would abuse its market position to their own benefit..." That's some fatalistic wording. How about: Company that publishes a free product and business model relies on ads, stops distributing app that piggybacks on their free product while circumventing ads.

Also true. But it’s a charitable way of putting a fundamentally broken contract on the open web since it was invented: you are in control of your browser. If you want reading mode, large text, anti-fingerprinting, disable autoplaying video, heck even banning popups, the browser is your tool and does what you tell it to. If Google or any other company comes between you and your browser then one part of the open web is…

Right. I think people were alert to these possibilities long before the actual stuff happened with Manifest V3.

And it shouldn't take waiting until specific examples happen to understand the incentives and the possibilities that could ripen at some future date.

And just to throw in my little side hobby horse on this conversation, it's what I find personally frustrating about conversations with people who think that Brave counts as an alternative.

Being attached at the hip to the Chromium project is a ground level commitment to a long-term vulnerability, and it means that similar circumstances could "ripen" at some future date as the family of Chromium browsers become dependent on an increasingly vast foundation of code and web standards. To me, the combination of that capability and the incentive should be enough to be treated as a complete argument which disqualifies Chromium derived browsers from counting as alternatives.

Re: uBlock Origin is no longer available on the Chrome Store

#349

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My understanding is Mozilla contracted its footprint substantially to remain sustainable in a future without Google's monetary contribution.

Then they wouldn't be throwing money into open firepits on trash like a VPN service or how to comply with Google's advertising decisions. Then they would let people contribute money to the browser (instead of to Mozilla Foundation which goes to enabling aforementioned trash fires) and to the salary of a multi-million dollar CEO after laying off developer staff and hiring more C-suite assistants. Mozilla is a bad orga…

Isn't Mozilla's VPN just a thin UI over Mullvad's servers? I don't think it costs them much and probably brings in some decent revenue.
Post reply on HN