Daylight saving time and early school start times cost billions
theconversation.com
Daylight saving time and early school start times cost billions
1–10 of 12 posts
Re: Daylight saving time and early school start times cost billions
#2This argues for continually adjusting our clocks throughout the year, so that sunrise happens at a stable time of day, doesn’t it?
Re: Daylight saving time and early school start times cost billions
#3> Our internal clocks are most stable when morning light exposure occurs early in the day, This argues for continually adjusting our clocks throughout the year, so that sunrise happens at a stable time of day, doesn’t it?
Re: Daylight saving time and early school start times cost billions
#4Re: Daylight saving time and early school start times cost billions
#5> Our internal clocks are most stable when morning light exposure occurs early in the day, This argues for continually adjusting our clocks throughout the year, so that sunrise happens at a stable time of day, doesn’t it?
I would imagine the subtle daily increase or decrease in daylight, even in extreme latitudes, is more natural and healthier than an immediate one hour shift in either direction.
Getting anything figured out would be a mess, obviously, if everything were synced up (from the clock on your grandma's kitchen wall up to the clock on say Air Force One) it'd be easier (hmm, I see even more pitchforks). Someone's daily meeting with overseas colleagues would be e.g. 9:56 today and 9:42 in a week's time.
Another alternative would be 4x15 minutes jumps, every Sunday in a month.
Re: Daylight saving time and early school start times cost billions
#61 - The only problem with DST is the change in timing. There is a spike in all sorts of issues including accidents, heart attacks, etc in these days. The change itself is a problem.
2 - We have constantly underestimated the need for sleep and its association with the circadian rhythm and as a result, we face a lot of problems. DST/Standard time changes were an effort to solve the problem for 1 group of people, Midwestern farmers, and imposed it on everyone else.
What we really need is to eliminate the DST/Standard Time confusion and then individual systems need to set their own times for doing things.
Those times will depend on the kind of work, the people jnvolved, and then depending on the time and the needs it may even have to change through the year.
But the onus should lie on my company and me, or my kid’s school and him to track what time they should be meeting through the year.
Re: Daylight saving time and early school start times cost billions
#7There are a couple of issues that get confused in this discussion that end up reinforcing the status quo. 1 - The only problem with DST is the change in timing. There is a spike in all sorts of issues including accidents, heart attacks, etc in these days. The change itself is a problem. 2 - We have constantly underestimated the need for sleep and its association with the circadian rhythm and as a result, we face a lo…
This is not true, DST has a long history and was first implemented in the US during WWI to conserve energy.
Re: Daylight saving time and early school start times cost billions
#8> Our internal clocks are most stable when morning light exposure occurs early in the day, This argues for continually adjusting our clocks throughout the year, so that sunrise happens at a stable time of day, doesn’t it?
Re: Daylight saving time and early school start times cost billions
#9Just like a broken clock that shows the right time twice per day, the ideal ruling suggested in the article will result in two perfect days every year.
At least the current scheme theoretically allows for 4 perfecy days per year! Note that I'm not saying that it is what really happens, though. It depends on school schedule and the dates of the switch. About the latter, I do think that the switch should happen as close as possible to the equinox, so towards the end of March, like in Europe.
Re: Daylight saving time and early school start times cost billions
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would imagine the subtle daily increase or decrease in daylight, even in extreme latitudes, is more natural and healthier than an immediate one hour shift in either direction.
Hmm, instead of an hour shift, a 30-day shift of 2 minutes per day would be an interesting experiment. Hey why do I see so many raised pitchforks all of a sudden? Getting anything figured out would be a mess, obviously, if everything were synced up (from the clock on your grandma's kitchen wall up to the clock on say Air Force One) it'd be easier (hmm, I see even more pitchforks). Someone's daily meeting with oversea…