Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can look at the Mini and tell whether you want a smaller iPad. Miniaturization has come at a premium forever. And would you propose that Apple doesn’t offer a cheap iPad for bulk purchases and kids? A lot of computing devices are the same externally and distinguished by slower processors and less internal features.
I would propose a lineup where spending more money won't result in less features.
Apple introduces iPad Air with powerful M3 chip and new Magic Keyboard
251–254 of 254 posts
Between the iPad -> iPad Air -> iPad Pro, which one gives you less features as you spend more?
Re: Apple introduces iPad Air with powerful M3 chip and new Magic Keyboard
#252Earlier quoted context omitted.
Never heard of decoy effect. Always referred to this phenomenon as “anchoring”
> Never heard of decoy effect. Always referred to this phenomenon as “anchoring” Correct. The example they gave is anchoring. Anchoring typically looks like $10-$25-$50, and they want you to buy the $25 item. Sometimes the presence of the $50 item can have zero sales, but the $25 item will sell better than if the options were just $10 and $25. Decoy would be more like $10-$40-$50, and they want you to buy the $50 ite…
Reminds me of Apple’s pricing scheme