Untitled topic
1–9 of 9 posts
Re: undefined
#2Re: undefined
#3For businesses running ~$10k+ workstations, there are options outside the Apple ecosystem. I mean, Apple’s systems can be fast at the $10k scale, but at $100k you can get a lot of modular horsepower outside the ecosystem than with 10 $10k boxes.
Re: undefined
#4I'm not sure, but M5 will beat them hands down. We should wait for it, or maybe M6, or...
Re: undefined
#5Reading Apple’s press release, all performance comparisons are with previous Apple products, and mostly in regard to Apple only software. For businesses running ~$10k+ workstations, there are options outside the Apple ecosystem. I mean, Apple’s systems can be fast at the $10k scale, but at $100k you can get a lot of modular horsepower outside the ecosystem than with 10 $10k boxes.
Re: undefined
#6Re: undefined
#7> Please don't use HN primarily for promotion. It's ok to post your own stuff part of the time, but the primary use of the site should be for curiosity.
Re: undefined
#8I am going to flag this because this account is being used primarily for self-promotion. See guidelines [1] > Please don't use HN primarily for promotion. It's ok to post your own stuff part of the time, but the primary use of the site should be for curiosity. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
That said, I’d love to hear your thoughts—do you see the M3 Ultra as a game-changer, or is it more of an iterative update?
Re: undefined
#9Reading Apple’s press release, all performance comparisons are with previous Apple products, and mostly in regard to Apple only software. For businesses running ~$10k+ workstations, there are options outside the Apple ecosystem. I mean, Apple’s systems can be fast at the $10k scale, but at $100k you can get a lot of modular horsepower outside the ecosystem than with 10 $10k boxes.
They always do that, never mention the competitors hardware in the comparisons.