There's little proof flossing protects your teeth or gums (2016)
21–27 of 27 posts
Re: There's little proof flossing protects your teeth or gums (2016)
#22Re: There's little proof flossing protects your teeth or gums (2016)
#23https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jan/19/inflam...
Re: There's little proof flossing protects your teeth or gums (2016)
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
Came here to write all of this. Even once a day is totally worth it.
I got myself a waterpik (water flosser) and got a sore throat for a few days after I first started using it. I'm going to assume this was due to the crud moving out from between my teeth. Recommend water flossers, I much prefer it to using conventional floss.
Re: There's little proof flossing protects your teeth or gums (2016)
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
What, really?
Lots of "glide"-style floss is PTFE tape: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oral-B_Glide . You can buy non-PTFE floss, like https://www.test.de/Zahnseide-Faedeln-ohne-schaedliche-Chemi... . It's not really about "waxed" vs non-waxed, though.
Re: There's little proof flossing protects your teeth or gums (2016)
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
What, really?
Lots of "glide"-style floss is PTFE tape: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oral-B_Glide . You can buy non-PTFE floss, like https://www.test.de/Zahnseide-Faedeln-ohne-schaedliche-Chemi... . It's not really about "waxed" vs non-waxed, though.
Re: There's little proof flossing protects your teeth or gums (2016)
#27Bit off-topic but interestingly the title of the article is "There's little proof flossing protects your teeth or gums" but when you, for example, send the link to somebody over (insert your favorite instant messenger with link previews), the title in the preview changes to a much more clickbait-y "Is flossing a waste of time?"
Or less likely, they're actually serving a different page to the preview bot.