Live data from Hacker News

China tells its AI leaders to avoid U.S. travel over security concerns

wsj.com

251–260 of 470 posts

Re: China tells its AI leaders to avoid U.S. travel over security concerns

#251

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Well IP is social construct. It is literally only illegal if your country’s laws says it is.

That's true of all law, including all property law. It’s not a distinct feature of IP.

Re: China tells its AI leaders to avoid U.S. travel over security concerns

#252

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One note, if you’re working for a top AI company in China, your quality of life other than work hours is already good enough to not to want to leave. It’s not 1990s/2000s anymore. Urban life in China, excluding pandemic times, is better than urban life in the states. The same applies to other sectors as well. Top talent is genuinely valued in China.

> Urban life in China, excluding pandemic times, is better than urban life in the states. What data do you have for this conclusion?

Apart from public bathrooms being much dirtier on average, they’ve modernized quite a bit. So, you can take me as 1st hand anecdotal evidence.

Re: China tells its AI leaders to avoid U.S. travel over security concerns

#253
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I often say states behave as mafias. It is a matter of becoming influential enough so that they treat you as a criminal. In the meantime, the streets every day less and less safe, at least in Europe, bc of real criminals, the ones that kill or systematically steal even in organized crime and they do very little about it.

In the European countries that I've bothered to look, crime statistics are actually down. It's just the perception of crime that is up. Think about who might benefit from creating this kind of misleading perception.

Crime stats are down in parts of America too, and it doesn’t mean a thing. Trust your eyes, not stats that can be gamed. These days a lot of crime stats are influenced by soft on crime laws, victims too jaded to report crimes, and more. The perception that crime is increasing is more right than wrong in my experience.

Re: China tells its AI leaders to avoid U.S. travel over security concerns

#254

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One note, if you’re working for a top AI company in China, your quality of life other than work hours is already good enough to not to want to leave. It’s not 1990s/2000s anymore. Urban life in China, excluding pandemic times, is better than urban life in the states. The same applies to other sectors as well. Top talent is genuinely valued in China.

> Urban life in China, excluding pandemic times, is better than urban life in the states. What data do you have for this conclusion?

I think a good chunk of America had their "Soviets seeing an American supermarket" moment on Red Note when they got to see what city life is actually like in China from the perspective of regular people.

Re: China tells its AI leaders to avoid U.S. travel over security concerns

#255

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The US stole it's IP as well when it was behind. Sam Slater was known as "The Founder of the American Factory System" in the US. In the UK he was known as "Slater the Traitor", because he stole some very important IP. Adam Smith wasn't a big fan of IP either. He was all about owning the means of production. China was taking notes. The dog ate America's homework.

[flagged]

[flagged]

Re: China tells its AI leaders to avoid U.S. travel over security concerns

#256

Why does the US still allow Chinese nationals to study at its universities and work at its companies? Seems like a big risk that cutting edge research and trade secrets will go to America’s main adversary. Industrial espionage by China has a long history, and China has more valuable things to steal from America than the other way.

I have good news for you. DeepSeek openly bragged that none of its people have “overseas experience”. They are all local talents.

Weren’t some of them educated abroad?

Re: China tells its AI leaders to avoid U.S. travel over security concerns

#257
post #132

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> salary comparison was valid pre-Trump Is it not valid now?

Salaries must be weighted by risk. Right now, there is a high risk that researchers funded by grants or working in government labs will lose their jobs and faculty will lose their grants and labs. Industry researchers are in a more stable situation, even though layoffs may be more common than on the average. And if we focus specifically on the academia, American salaries have never been that high. Sure the numbers in…

On top of those issues there's also a wave of anti-intellectualism and xenophobia from the Trump government.

When the US model used to be to attract top worldwide researchers, that's pretty much the targeted demographics.

Re: China tells its AI leaders to avoid U.S. travel over security concerns

#258

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"When elephants fight, it's the grass that gets trampled" Not sure of the attribution of this quote.

I got this off a .ke domain site that has an "African proverb of the day": > In the 1970s Julius Nyerere (then the President of Tanzania) used this proverb in a speech at the United Nations in New York. The Democratic Republic of the Congo (then Zaire) Ambassador to Great Britain used this same proverb in a talk to a group of Missionaries of Africa (White Fathers) in London. The meaning was the same: In the Cold War…

I know it as: If the elephants are fighting or fucking the ants are scared

The context I heard it was politics

Re: China tells its AI leaders to avoid U.S. travel over security concerns

#259
post #63

The interesting thing in this article isn’t that China is telling people to avoid the US for national security reasons. Many states, including the US have similar guidance to people who work in jobs sensitive to national security. What’s interesting is that China is viewing AI tech as a technology vital to their security.

The real reason why states are pouring billions into AI isn't to generate silly emoji, help people rewrite their emails, or make a web app without learning how to code. It's for autonomous drone warfare. Invading a neighboring nation doesn't seem too appealing if it means sending tens/hundreds of thousands of your young people (a resource that's getting scarcer and scarcer most everywhere in the world) to the meat gr…

Online propaganda is insanely powerful too. Not sure if many noticed, but the English put out by Chinese teams is often perfect these days.

Re: China tells its AI leaders to avoid U.S. travel over security concerns

#260

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One note, if you’re working for a top AI company in China, your quality of life other than work hours is already good enough to not to want to leave. It’s not 1990s/2000s anymore. Urban life in China, excluding pandemic times, is better than urban life in the states. The same applies to other sectors as well. Top talent is genuinely valued in China.

> Urban life in China, excluding pandemic times, is better than urban life in the states. What data do you have for this conclusion?

Great public transit. Affordable housing. Huge variety of delicious food. Low crime. People who care enough about the social good to wear masks in crowded places during a pandemic.
Post reply on HN