Live data from Hacker News

An update on Mozilla's terms of use for Firefox

blog.mozilla.org

241–250 of 381 posts

Re: An update on Mozilla's terms of use for Firefox

#241
post #2

Is Google paying Mozilla to sabotage themselves? Stay in business, so monopoly arguments can be brushed aside. But slowly erode privacy on the internet. And slowly lose user base.

Yes, of course. If Mozilla decided to do what other user here suggested (`spend $15M on a team of 20+ highly competent full time developers for Firefox, put $450M into a trust to fund future development`) I doubt that the 500M/year would continue flowing.

Re: An update on Mozilla's terms of use for Firefox

#242
post #207

> The reason we’ve stepped away from making blanket claims that “We never sell your data” is because, in some places, the LEGAL definition of “sale of data” is broad and evolving. As an example, the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) defines “sale” as the “selling, renting, releasing, disclosing, disseminating, making available, transferring, or otherwise communicating orally, in writing, or by electronic or othe…

They also said "Mozilla doesn’t sell data about you (in the way that most people think about “selling data”)", and I'm struggling to fathom what they could possibly think that "most people" think selling data could mean other than "giving your data to someone else for compensation", which seems pretty much exactly what the California law says. Yes, it's embedded in some legalese, but surely Mozilla has lawyers?

I think they're trying to make the distinction between "we sell your searches and clicks attached to your personal id" and "we sell derivative aggregated information like we have a lot of users of X style to advertise to". But it's kinda hard to sift through exactly what they can and can't sell under this.

Re: An update on Mozilla's terms of use for Firefox

#243

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I really struggle to understand what legal team believes this language is necessary in downloaded software. Exactly. Even if nothing is changing at Mozilla, their legal team has invented a new interpretation of copyright law. That’s a huge deal from a legal perspective—Apple, Google, Microsoft, etc need to be rushing to add corresponding terms to their applications. Mozilla PR is dropping the ball completely by try…

Switching to what? Honest question, not asking for a friend.

I switched to https://librewolf.net/

Re: An update on Mozilla's terms of use for Firefox

#244

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And if everyone switches to Librewolf, Librewolf will die because Mozilla will no longer make money and won't be able to devote resources towards maintaining upstream Firefox. I use Firefox. I hate ads. I don't love that Mozilla engages in some level of affiliate deals to pay the bills, but it's the only viable alternative to Google controlling the entire web and doing much worse tracking/advertising at this point, u…

> Mozilla will no longer make money Mozilla could have added years ago a donation or subscription to fund the development of Firefox, but they don't want that. Mozilla wants all the money for its charitable activities instead. There will be a time when they have no money anymore, but it's only their fault.

I doubt donation would be anywhere close to what is needed for development even if that exists.

Re: An update on Mozilla's terms of use for Firefox

#245

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And if everyone switches to Librewolf, Librewolf will die because Mozilla will no longer make money and won't be able to devote resources towards maintaining upstream Firefox. I use Firefox. I hate ads. I don't love that Mozilla engages in some level of affiliate deals to pay the bills, but it's the only viable alternative to Google controlling the entire web and doing much worse tracking/advertising at this point, u…

> Mozilla will no longer make money Mozilla could have added years ago a donation or subscription to fund the development of Firefox, but they don't want that. Mozilla wants all the money for its charitable activities instead. There will be a time when they have no money anymore, but it's only their fault.

I think it's not that they don't want it as it's difficult to mix money from commercial activities with donations. That's why they keep the two cash flows separate and are only using Google money for Firefox development, and spend donations exclusively on political bullshit very few people care about.

Although their $7 mil CEO could have found a way to handle this while not running afoul of the IRS, but she decided to play with a bunch of dead-end commercial endeavors instead. So that's on them.

Re: An update on Mozilla's terms of use for Firefox

#246
"we never sell your data" but we actually do it...

For me, sharing my data even with "privacy preserving way" is not ok with the spirit I expected from something like Firefox.

Even just something like "someone open new tabs 50 times with your advertisement there" or "someone went to your website last Friday" is not ok to share about me and my activity!

So sad that corporate assholes took control of the project and try to confuse us with bullshit.

Re: An update on Mozilla's terms of use for Firefox

#247

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Librewolf is a Firefox fork with this crap removed.

And if everyone switches to Librewolf, Librewolf will die because Mozilla will no longer make money and won't be able to devote resources towards maintaining upstream Firefox. I use Firefox. I hate ads. I don't love that Mozilla engages in some level of affiliate deals to pay the bills, but it's the only viable alternative to Google controlling the entire web and doing much worse tracking/advertising at this point, u…

Na, Mozilla will die and Firefox and Thunderbird will get transferred to a community project, Thunderbird survived without Mozilla so will Firefox.

Pretty sure that community project will get overwhelmingly big donations from all over.

Re: An update on Mozilla's terms of use for Firefox

#248
Some higher ups at Mozilla have realised an opportunity to train an AI on user data. Theft of user data at this unprecedented scale will be covered by the fig leaf of ToS, at least it's their plan. They really belong to prison, but the gov is knee deep in the same business, and so it's not going to do anything about it.

Re: An update on Mozilla's terms of use for Firefox

#249
post #233

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> let's see if we can make this honest! They're beholden to who gives them money, which is not us.

It could be us, either directly with money, or even just indirectly by “being the product” but being able to just walk away. FF exists off of good will and the search deal. The more people stop using the browser the less they’re going to pull in from the deal.

> FF exists off of good will and the search deal

Firefox exists off of google and their antitrust deal.

Re: An update on Mozilla's terms of use for Firefox

#250

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And if everyone switches to Librewolf, Librewolf will die because Mozilla will no longer make money and won't be able to devote resources towards maintaining upstream Firefox. I use Firefox. I hate ads. I don't love that Mozilla engages in some level of affiliate deals to pay the bills, but it's the only viable alternative to Google controlling the entire web and doing much worse tracking/advertising at this point, u…

> Mozilla will no longer make money Mozilla could have added years ago a donation or subscription to fund the development of Firefox, but they don't want that. Mozilla wants all the money for its charitable activities instead. There will be a time when they have no money anymore, but it's only their fault.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN