Live data from Hacker News

Crossing the uncanny valley of conversational voice

sesame.com

1–10 of 17 posts

Re: Crossing the uncanny valley of conversational voice

#8
The voice is really good, especially small details like sharp air intake before a response to indicate tone. I guess the conversation topics weren't amazing but that's not really the point.

The problem I have is that if you want to engage with something like this, you need to pretend it's a human. As they say, the uncanny valley was pretty much successfully crossed. And to be honest, I don't want to pretend I'm talking to a human for a whole bunch of reasons.

The technically aspects are really impressive, but I think "pretending to be a human" in this way is a pretty scary goal. The cognitive dissonance was too strong and it was hard for me to continue a conversation very long at all. What does it even mean to have a conversation without theory of mind?

Re: Crossing the uncanny valley of conversational voice

#10
You can ask it to talk serious without any quips or follow on questions and it's just a more sycophantic chatbot with great interruption flow.

The realism is needed to unlock next-gen use-cases. Then you can trust it to be an easily adjustable medium on the fly while you do more things.

Post reply on HN