You can get your HN profile analyzed by it and it's pretty funny :) https://hn-wrapped.kadoa.com/ I'm using this to test the humor of new models.
The roast could probably be improved. Mine wasn't offensive at all.
611–620 of 1001 posts
You can get your HN profile analyzed by it and it's pretty funny :) https://hn-wrapped.kadoa.com/ I'm using this to test the humor of new models.
The roast could probably be improved. Mine wasn't offensive at all.
You can get your HN profile analyzed by it and it's pretty funny :) https://hn-wrapped.kadoa.com/ I'm using this to test the humor of new models.
LOL! The roast is just brutal.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Have you seen https://mycoder.ai ? Seems quite similar. It was my own invention and it seems that you guys are thinking along similar lines - incredibly similar lines.
Have you seen https://www.codebuff.com ?
It seems very very similar. I open sourced the code to MyCoder here: https://github.com/drivecore/mycoder I'll compare them. Off hand I think both CodeBuff and Claude Coder are missing the web debugging tools I added to MyCoder.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The API still has limits. Even if you are on the highest tier, you will quickly run into those limits when using coding assistants. The value proposition of Glama is that it combines UI and API. While everyone focuses on either one or the other, I've been splitting my time equally working on both. Glama UI would not win against Anthropic if we were to compare them by the number of features. However, the components th…
> Even if you are on the highest tier, you will quickly run into those limits when using coding assistants. Even heavy coding sessions never run into Claude limits, and I’m nowhere near the highest tier.
You can get your HN profile analyzed by it and it's pretty funny :) https://hn-wrapped.kadoa.com/ I'm using this to test the humor of new models.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Interesting that the "correct diff format" score went from 99.6% with Claude 3.5 to 93.3% for Claude 3.7. My experience with using claude-code was that it consistently required several tries to get the right diff. Hopefully all that will improve as they get things ironed out.
Reasoning models pretty reliably seem to do worse at exacting output formats/structured outputs—so far with Aider it has been an effective strategy to employ o1 to “think” about the issue at hand, and have Sonnet implement. Interested to try various approaches with 3.7 in various combinations of reasoning effort.
Hi everyone! Boris from the Claude Code team here. @eschluntz, @catherinewu, @wolffiex, @bdr and I will be around for the next hour or so and we'll do our best to answer your questions about the product.
I really want to try your AI models, but "You must have a valid phone number to use Anthropic's services." is a show-stopper for me. It's the only mainstream AI service that requests this information. After a string of security lapses by many of your competitors, I have zero faith in the ability of a "fast moving" AI-focused company to keep my PII data secure.
You can get your HN profile analyzed by it and it's pretty funny :) https://hn-wrapped.kadoa.com/ I'm using this to test the humor of new models.
You can get your HN profile analyzed by it and it's pretty funny :) https://hn-wrapped.kadoa.com/ I'm using this to test the humor of new models.