Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code

anthropic.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

381–390 of 1001 posts

Re: Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code

#381

Post by xianshou »

bcherny wrote: post #91

Hi everyone! Boris from the Claude Code team here. @eschluntz, @catherinewu, @wolffiex, @bdr and I will be around for the next hour or so and we'll do our best to answer your questions about the product.

Any way to parallelize tool use? When I go into a repo and ask "what's in here", I'm aiming for a summary that returns in 20 seconds.

Re: Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code

#382

Post by stribbon »

smallerfish wrote: post #207
eschluntz wrote: post #160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We are definitely aware of this (and working on it for the web UI), and that's why Claude Code goes directly through the API!

I'm sure many of us would gladly pay more to get 3-5x the limit. And I'm also sure that you're working on it, but some kind of auto-summarization of facts to reduce the context in order to avoid penalizing long threads would be sweet. I don't know if your internal users are dogfooding the product that has user limits, so you may not have had this feedback - it makes me irritable/stressed to know that I'm running up c…

[flagged]

Re: Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code

#383

Post by andrewchilds »

bcherny wrote: post #91

Hi everyone! Boris from the Claude Code team here. @eschluntz, @catherinewu, @wolffiex, @bdr and I will be around for the next hour or so and we'll do our best to answer your questions about the product.

Hi Boris! Thank you for your work on Claude! My one pet peeve with Claude specifically, if I may: I might be working on a Svelte codebase and Claude will happily ignore that context and provide React code. I understand why, but I’d love to see much less of a deep reliance on React for front-end code generation.

Re: Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code

#384

Post by PKop »

bcherny wrote: post #91

Hi everyone! Boris from the Claude Code team here. @eschluntz, @catherinewu, @wolffiex, @bdr and I will be around for the next hour or so and we'll do our best to answer your questions about the product.

It would be great to have a C# / .NET SDK available for Claude so it can be integrated into Semantic Kernel [0][1]. Are there any plans for this?

[0] https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/issues/5690#iss...

[1] https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/pull/7364

Re: Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code

#385

Post by timojaask »

bcherny wrote: post #91

Hi everyone! Boris from the Claude Code team here. @eschluntz, @catherinewu, @wolffiex, @bdr and I will be around for the next hour or so and we'll do our best to answer your questions about the product.

Hi! I’ve been using Claude for macOS and iOS coding for a while, and it’s mostly great, but it’s always using deprecated APIs, even if I instruct it not to. It will correct the mistake if I ask it to, but then in later iterations, it will sometimes switch back to using a deprecated API. It also produces a lot of code that just doesn’t compile, so a lot of time is spent fixing the made up or deprecated APIs.

Re: Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code

#386

Post by Workaccount2 »

Squarex wrote: post #345
freediver wrote: post #251

Kagi LLM benchmark updated with general purpose and thinking mode for Sonnet 3.7. https://help.kagi.com/kagi/ai/llm-benchmark.html Appears to be second most capable general purpose LLM we tried (second to gemini 2.0 pro, in front of gpt-4o). Less impressive in thinking mode, about at the same level as o1-mini and o3-mini (with 8192 token thinking budget). Overall a very nice update, you get higher quality and higher…

I'm surprised that Gemini 2.0 is first now. I remember that Google models were under performing on kagi benchmarks.

Having your own hardware to run LLMs will pay dividends. Despite getting off on the wrong foot, I still believe Google is best positioned to run away with the AI lead, solely because they are not beholden to Nvidia and not stuck with a 3rd party cloud provider. They are the only AI team that is top to bottom in-house.

Re: Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code

#387

Post by KTibow »

freediver wrote: post #251

Kagi LLM benchmark updated with general purpose and thinking mode for Sonnet 3.7. https://help.kagi.com/kagi/ai/llm-benchmark.html Appears to be second most capable general purpose LLM we tried (second to gemini 2.0 pro, in front of gpt-4o). Less impressive in thinking mode, about at the same level as o1-mini and o3-mini (with 8192 token thinking budget). Overall a very nice update, you get higher quality and higher…

One thing I don't understand is why Claude 3.5 Haiku, a non thinking model in the non thinking section, says it has a 8192 thinking budget.

Re: Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code

#388

Post by handfuloflight »

bhouston wrote: post #306
bcherny wrote: post #91

Hi everyone! Boris from the Claude Code team here. @eschluntz, @catherinewu, @wolffiex, @bdr and I will be around for the next hour or so and we'll do our best to answer your questions about the product.

Have you seen https://mycoder.ai ? Seems quite similar. It was my own invention and it seems that you guys are thinking along similar lines - incredibly similar lines.

Have you seen https://www.codebuff.com?
Post reply on HN