Earlier quoted context omitted.
The biggest complaint I (and several others) have is that we continuously hit the limit via the UI after even just a few intensive queries. Of course, we can use the console API, but then we lose ability to have things like Projects, etc. Do you foresee these limitations increasing anytime soon? Quick Edit: Just wanted to also say thank you for all your hard work, Claude has been phenomenal.
If you are open to alternatives, try https://glama.ai/gateway We currently serve ~10bn tokens per day (across all models). OpenAI compatible API. No rate limits. Built in logging and tracing. I work with LLMs every day, so I am always on top of adding models. 3.7 is also already available. https://glama.ai/models/claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219 The gateway is integrated directly into our chat ( https://glama.ai/chat ). So…
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code
341–350 of 1001 posts
Re: Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code
#342Hi everyone! Boris from the Claude Code team here. @eschluntz, @catherinewu, @wolffiex, @bdr and I will be around for the next hour or so and we'll do our best to answer your questions about the product.
Re: Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code
#343Earlier quoted context omitted.
Could you tell us a bit about the coding tools you use and how you go about interacting with Claude?
We find that Claude is really good at test driven development, so we often ask Claude to write tests first and then ask Claude to iterate against the tests
Re: Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code
#344Hi everyone! Boris from the Claude Code team here. @eschluntz, @catherinewu, @wolffiex, @bdr and I will be around for the next hour or so and we'll do our best to answer your questions about the product.
edit: note that my team mostly hits rate limits using things like aider and goose. 80k input token is not enough when in a flow, and I would love to experiment with a multi-agent workflow using claude
Re: Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code
#345Kagi LLM benchmark updated with general purpose and thinking mode for Sonnet 3.7. https://help.kagi.com/kagi/ai/llm-benchmark.html Appears to be second most capable general purpose LLM we tried (second to gemini 2.0 pro, in front of gpt-4o). Less impressive in thinking mode, about at the same level as o1-mini and o3-mini (with 8192 token thinking budget). Overall a very nice update, you get higher quality and higher…
Re: Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code
#346Hi everyone! Boris from the Claude Code team here. @eschluntz, @catherinewu, @wolffiex, @bdr and I will be around for the next hour or so and we'll do our best to answer your questions about the product.
Re: Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code
#347Claude 3.7 Sonnet scored 60.4% on the aider polyglot leaderboard [0], WITHOUT USING THINKING. Tied for 3rd place with o3-mini-high. Sonnet 3.7 has the highest non-thinking score, taking that title from Sonnet 3.5. Aider 0.75.0 is out with support for 3.7 Sonnet [1]. Thinking support and thinking benchmark results coming soon. [0] https://aider.chat/docs/leaderboards/ [1] https://aider.chat/HISTORY.html#aider-v0750
Re: Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code
#348Re: Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code
#349You can get your HN profile analyzed by it and it's pretty funny :) https://hn-wrapped.kadoa.com/ I'm using this to test the humor of new models.
Got absolutely read to filth: > You've spent more time explaining why Go's error handling is bad than Go developers have spent actually handling errors. > Your relationship with programming languages is like a dating show - you keep finding flaws in all of them but can't commit to just one. > If error handling were a religion, you'd be its most zealous missionary, converting the unchecked one exception at a time.
> After years of defending Go, you'll secretly start a side project in Rust but tell no one on HN about your betrayal
Re: Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code
#350Earlier quoted context omitted.
this is also my problem, ive only used the UI with $20 subscription, can I use the same subscription to use the cli? I'm afraid its like those aws api billing where there is no limit to how much I can use then get a surprise bill
It is API billing like AWS - you pay for what you use. Every time you exit a session we print the cost, and in the middle of a session you can do /cost to see your cost so far that session! You can track costs in a few ways and set spend limits to avoid surprises: https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/agents-and-tools/claude-c...