I accepted it when Knuth did it with TeX's versioning. And I sort of accept it with Python (after the 2-3 transition fiasco), but this is getting annoying. Why not just use natural numbers for major releases?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code
271–280 of 1001 posts
Re: Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code
#272Kagi LLM benchmark updated with general purpose and thinking mode for Sonnet 3.7. https://help.kagi.com/kagi/ai/llm-benchmark.html Appears to be second most capable general purpose LLM we tried (second to gemini 2.0 pro, in front of gpt-4o). Less impressive in thinking mode, about at the same level as o1-mini and o3-mini (with 8192 token thinking budget). Overall a very nice update, you get higher quality and higher…
Re: Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code
#273> "[..] in developing our reasoning models, we’ve optimized somewhat less for math and computer science competition problems, and instead shifted focus towards real-world tasks that better reflect how businesses actually use LLMs.” This is good news. OpenAI seems to be aiming towards "the smartest model," but in practice, LLMs are used primarily as learning aids, data transformers, and code writers. Balancing "intell…
Claude 3.5 has been fantastic in Windsurf. However, it does cost credits. DeepSeek V3 is now available in Windsurf at zero credit cost, which was a major shift for the company. Great to have variable options either way. I’d highly recommend anyone check out Windsurf’s Cascade feature for agentic-like code writing and exploration. It helped save me many hours in understanding new codebases and tracing data flows.
Re: Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code
#274Hi everyone! Boris from the Claude Code team here. @eschluntz, @catherinewu, @wolffiex, @bdr and I will be around for the next hour or so and we'll do our best to answer your questions about the product.
What kind of sorcery did you use to create Claude? Honest question :)
Re: Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code
#275It's pretty fascinating to refresh the usage page on the API site while working [0]. After initialization it was up to 500k tokens ($1.50). After a few questions and a small edit, I'm up to over a million tokens (>$3.00). Not sure if the amount of code navigation and typing saved will justify the expense yet. It'll take a bit more experimentation. In any case, the default API buy of $5 seems woefully low to explore t…
It also produces terrible code even though it's supposed to be good for front-end development.
Re: Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code
#276Re: Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code
#277> "[..] in developing our reasoning models, we’ve optimized somewhat less for math and computer science competition problems, and instead shifted focus towards real-world tasks that better reflect how businesses actually use LLMs.” This is good news. OpenAI seems to be aiming towards "the smartest model," but in practice, LLMs are used primarily as learning aids, data transformers, and code writers. Balancing "intell…
Thanks! We all dogfood Claude every day to do our own work here, and solving our own pain points is more exciting to us than abstract benchmarks. Getting things done require a lot of booksmarts, but also a lot of "street smarts" - knowing when to answer quickly, when to double back, etc
Re: Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code
#278Hi everyone! Boris from the Claude Code team here. @eschluntz, @catherinewu, @wolffiex, @bdr and I will be around for the next hour or so and we'll do our best to answer your questions about the product.
Re: Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code
#279You can get your HN profile analyzed by it and it's pretty funny :) https://hn-wrapped.kadoa.com/ I'm using this to test the humor of new models.
> You're the only person who gets excited about trailing commas in SQL. Even the database administrators are like 'dude, it's just a comma.'
Re: Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code
#280You can get your HN profile analyzed by it and it's pretty funny :) https://hn-wrapped.kadoa.com/ I'm using this to test the humor of new models.
Your comments about suburban missile defense systems have the FBI agent monitoring your internet connection seriously questioning their career choices.
You've spent so much time explaining why manufacturing is complex that you could have just built your own CRT factory by now.
You claim to be skeptical of AI hype, yet you've indexed more documentation with Cursor than most people have read in their lifetime.
Surprisingly accurate, but seems to be based on a very small snippet of actual comments (presumably to save money). I wonder what the prompt would output when given the full 200k tokens of context.