61–70 of 1001 posts
Just like OpenAI or Grok, there is no transparency and no way for self-hosting purposes. Your input and confidential information can be collected for training purposes. I just don't trust those companies when you use their servers. This is not a good approach to LLM democratization.
Anthropic claims they don’t train on their inputs. I haven’t seen any reason to disbelieve them.
I've been using O3-mini with reasoning effort set to high in Aider and loving the pricing. This looks as though it'll be about three times as expensive. Curious to see which falls out as most useful for what over the next month!
[flagged]
When did you make your account? I could have sworn I had to verify with my phone number before payment.
[flagged]
> Why would my phone number be any of their business? Preventing abuse? It's much harder to create a throwaway phone number than a throwaway email address. > OpenAI does the logical thing. Let's me enter my credit card and I'm good to go. I will stay with them. You'd rather hand over your credit card than your phone number? I think most people would see it the other way around.
Just like OpenAI or Grok, there is no transparency and no way for self-hosting purposes. Your input and confidential information can be collected for training purposes. I just don't trust those companies when you use their servers. This is not a good approach to LLM democratization.
[flagged]
I’m rooting for Anthropic.
> Third, in developing our reasoning models, we’ve optimized somewhat less for math and computer science competition problems, and instead shifted focus towards real-world tasks that better reflect how businesses actually use LLMs. Company: we find that optimizing for LeetCode level programming is not a good use of resources, and we should be training AI less on competition problems. Also Company: we hire SWEs based…
I kinda agree that this is probably reason why companies are doing it. I don't like it, but this is besides the matter.
Using Claude other models in interviews probably won't be allowed any time soon, but I do use it the work. So it does make sense.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Why would my phone number be any of their business? Preventing abuse? It's much harder to create a throwaway phone number than a throwaway email address. > OpenAI does the logical thing. Let's me enter my credit card and I'm good to go. I will stay with them. You'd rather hand over your credit card than your phone number? I think most people would see it the other way around.
Credit card is easily changed. Phone number is much more difficult.
Your phone number isn't.
What is a company going to do with your phone number that you're worried about...?
> Third, in developing our reasoning models, we’ve optimized somewhat less for math and computer science competition problems, and instead shifted focus towards real-world tasks that better reflect how businesses actually use LLMs. Company: we find that optimizing for LeetCode level programming is not a good use of resources, and we should be training AI less on competition problems. Also Company: we hire SWEs based…
Some try to do something more like "real-world" tasks, but those end up either being either just toy problems, or long take homes
Personally, I feel the most important things to prioritize when hiring are: is the candidate going to get along with their teammates (colleagues, boss, etc), and do they have the basic skills to relatively quickly learn their jobs once they start?