Have you seen someone already using generative AI to automatically generate optimized JIT compiler frontends from interpreter definitions?
AI-generated JIT compilers from interpreters: Are we there yet?
1–3 of 3 posts
Re: AI-generated JIT compilers from interpreters: Are we there yet?
#2I see no reason for any sort of AI to be applied here.
There's an interesting guide on converting an interpreter into a static binary translator: https://gtoal.com/sbt/
It would be great to see this expanded into a JIT compiler (using a generic translated code management/caching and optimization framework).
Re: AI-generated JIT compilers from interpreters: Are we there yet?
#3I see no reason for any sort of AI to be applied here. There's an interesting guide on converting an interpreter into a static binary translator: https://gtoal.com/sbt/ It would be great to see this expanded into a JIT compiler (using a generic translated code management/caching and optimization framework).
In a world where AI has crept into virtually every activity, it is hard to believe that AI cannot help in compiler generation.
Why would the field of JIT meta-compilers be exempt from AI?