Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Not a cultural thing, S/he's is just quicker and thus more efficient.
BritCSS: Fixes CSS to use non-American English
151–160 of 180 posts
Re: BritCSS: Fixes CSS to use non-American English
#152Re: BritCSS: Fixes CSS to use non-American English
#153Re: BritCSS: Fixes CSS to use non-American English
#154Re: BritCSS: Fixes CSS to use non-American English
#155Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
This site is exhausting sometimes. Y'all really have the ability to pedantically pick apart everything.
Re: BritCSS: Fixes CSS to use non-American English
#156Earlier quoted context omitted.
However I think that when Americans brought it back they missed opportunity to get rid of 'c' and put 'k' there instead. Is 'c' even used in English language? It usually is just 'k' or 's'.
Usually, but not always. Here you go—'cinch'. Could replace the first 'c' with s, but the second instance would be a little more difficult, as 'sh' has a softer pronunciation than 'ch' here, which itself is not as hard as 'j' (emoji) or 'ge' (rage).
Re: BritCSS: Fixes CSS to use non-American English
#157Earlier quoted context omitted.
I mean, wouldn't the U.S as a nation essentially be a bastard child of Britain, and thusly use a bastardized English?
Strangely, it's the insular dialects across Britain that have become more bastardised over time. The North American English dialects are far more conservative when it comes to evolution. As this BBC article[1] says: "[...] although there are plenty of variations, modern American pronunciation is generally more akin to at least the 18th-Century British kind than modern British pronunciation. Shakespearean English, thi…
Re: BritCSS: Fixes CSS to use non-American English
#158Are you trying to tell me that the British gentleman Sir Tim Berners-Lee misspelled all these things when they went into the spec that CSS was based from? \s (sort of)
Tim? CSS was created by Håkon Wium Lie (norwegian) and Bert Bos (dutch).
Re: BritCSS: Fixes CSS to use non-American English
#159Earlier quoted context omitted.
The transition in spelling from "colos" to "color" did not have anything with culture, but it has correctly reflected a change in the pronunciation of the word. English is one of few languages where the relationship between the writing and the pronunciation of the vowels is mostly unpredictable, so knowing whether a word is spelled with "o" or with "ou" does not help you to know how to pronounce it. So for the case o…
> English is one of few languages where the relationship between the writing and the pronunciation of the vowels is mostly unpredictable, so knowing whether a word is spelled with "o" or with "ou" does not help you to know how to pronounce it. That is true, but it's a trade-off made for other benefits. Why is there a silent "g" in "sign"? Because it provides semantic meaning - it preserves its connection to works lik…