From the article: > The wallet in question appears to have sent 401,346 ETH ($1.1 billion) as well as several other iterations of staked ether (stETH) to a fresh wallet, which is now liquidating mETH and stETH on decentralized exchanges, etherscan shows. The wallet has sold around $200 million worth of stETH so far. If you showed me a paragraph like this a decade ago and told me it was from 2025, I would have a diffi…
Bybit loses $1.5B in hack
21–30 of 381 posts
Re: Bybit loses $1.5B in hack
#22[flagged]
It has this kind of veil of "high techness" to it that is appealing to smart-but-uninformed people (like me in 2021). I'm embarrassed that I fell for it, but on the bright side it does make me a bit more sympathetic for other people who also fell for it.
Re: Bybit loses $1.5B in hack
#23It's obviously not a cold wallet if it's connected to the exchange.
Re: Bybit loses $1.5B in hack
#24another "exchange was hacked" story, why I am not surprised.
Re: Bybit loses $1.5B in hack
#25[flagged]
For context, guluarte is referring to a moderately contentious hardfork done by the Ethereum developers and mining community to reverse TheDAO Hack in 2016 or so. The stakes were much larger then -- Ethereum was newer, not yet battle tested, and TheDAO had something like 10% of all ETH in it.
A fork was formed -- "ETH Classic" -- ticker ETC -- which did not reverse the DAO hack, and you can see from valuations that the public preferred the reversal.
Re: Bybit loses $1.5B in hack
#26Re: Bybit loses $1.5B in hack
#27Unregulated asset exchanges. Haven't we been there before a loong time ago?
Re: Bybit loses $1.5B in hack
#28[flagged]
The genius behind crypto is that it's not just the extremely gullible. I know a fair number of really smart people, academics even, that have bought into the cryptocurrency hype. It has this kind of veil of "high techness" to it that is appealing to smart-but-uninformed people (like me in 2021). I'm embarrassed that I fell for it, but on the bright side it does make me a bit more sympathetic for other people who also…
Re: Bybit loses $1.5B in hack
#29 Bybit CEO Ben Zhou wrote on X that a hacker "took control of the specific ETH cold wallet and transferred all the ETH in the cold wallet to this unidentified address."
"Control" has a specific meaning under UCC Article 12, which was ratified in 2022 and is slowly being adopted by U.S. states. It links some rights to control/possession of keys, even if a blockchain asset may have been stolen before being sold, https://www.clearygottlieb.com//news-and-insights/publicatio...> Article 12 – dealing directly with the acquisition and disposition of interests (including security interests) in “controllable electronic records,” which would include Bitcoin, Ether, and a variety of other digital assets ... a good faith purchaser for value who obtains control (a “qualifying purchaser”) takes its interest free of conflicting property claims... Control under Article 12 is designed to be a technology-neutral functional equivalent of “possession.” It generally encompasses circumstances when a party has the “private key”
Re: Bybit loses $1.5B in hack
#30[flagged]
So salty! And yet...How's ETH Classic doing? It was the right move at the time to fork. And pretty obviously would be the wrong move today. For context, guluarte is referring to a moderately contentious hardfork done by the Ethereum developers and mining community to reverse TheDAO Hack in 2016 or so. The stakes were much larger then -- Ethereum was newer, not yet battle tested, and TheDAO had something like 10% of a…
Code is law, up until it costs me.